Bellhorn vs. Graffanino vs. Lamprey

July 29, 2005 at 2:38 AM

16 Comments

Recommended (0) | Share

Hi! I'm Sam, aka the Boston Fan in Michigan. You may know me from such fine internet establishments as Blue Cats and Red Sox and Roar of the Tigers. I'm here today to provide an in-depth look at one of the most vital questions plaguing the Boston Red Sox today.

If you had to choose a second baseman from a pool consisting of Mark Bellhorn, Tony Graffanino, and a Dead Sea Lamprey, who should you choose?

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Because I'm all about the Science, we'll look at this point-by-point.

Age

Bellhorn will be 31 in August, Graffanino is 33. The dead sea lamprey has a sort of Age-Gate thing going on, because we can't quite be sure how old he is. Any birth certificate he produces is almost certainly a falsified document, but educated estimates place him at about a year old.

Bellhorn isn't terribly old for a second baseman, and he's been relatively durable. Graffanino is older, and is used to logging less innings. The sea lamprey, though with the advantage of youth, is already in a state of decay, and as such has little future with the team.

EDGE: Bellhorn

Strikeouts

Bellhorn has 109 on the season, Graffanino has 31, the dead sea lamprey would have around 5. He's a terrible contact hitter, can't get anything going with the bat. A lack of opposable thumbs or, indeed, true skeletal structure might have come into play here. But the fact remains that his strikezone is prohibitively small, so he just doesn't strike out that often.

Graffanino has many fewer at-bats than Bellhorn does, but he still strikes out a lot less.

EDGE: dead sea lamprey

OBP

Bellhorn's is .328, Graffanino's is 3.79, the dead sea lamprey's would be around .468. Standing mere inches off the plate, he has an imposingly small strikezone that most pitchers can't handle. He talks a lot of walks as a result, which is good, because he basically cannot hit the ball.

The difference between batting average and OBP for Bellhorn is .112, for Graffanino it's .079, and for the dead sea lamprey, assuming a sad BA of around .179, the difference is .292. Bellhorn walks much more than he hits, but the dead sea lamprey clearly takes the biscuit here.

EDGE: dead sea lamprey

Power

Bellhorn is slugging .360, Graffanino is slugging .390, and the dead sea lamprey is slugging .100. Graffanino's numbers are indicative of a smaller sample size than what Bellhorn has; I don't actuallly think he's got more power. Over his careeer Bellhorn has slugged .412 while Graffanino slugged .388. That sounds about right.

As for the dead sea lamprey, well, we're assuming this is an American League dead sea lamprey, which means that at least once he gets to face Jose 'Homerun Machine' Lima, which is all that's keeping his SLG percentage from being .000.

EDGE: Bellhorn, Graffanino in an 'on' year.

Speed

Bellhorn has a 43.3 stolen base percentage, Graffanino has a 45.5% one. That's comparable. Neither guy is terrifically quick but neither is particularly lead-footed.

The dead sea lamprey is fantastic on the basepaths. He can slide easily in under tags, and opposing catchers are loathe to approach his leaking, rasping mouth when he slides into home.

EDGE: dead sea lamprey

Hotness

Tony G isn't half bad, and he recently showed up for an in-clubhouse postgame interview on NESN in a sleeveless shirt, which caused much joy. He's got an angled kind of jawline that is very nice, and he's got the whole dark Italian look going.

The Bellhorn attraction I do not understand. He's not fat, that's about all I got. Beyond that his face is not pleasing, his hair is disgusting, and he has the emotive range of a piece of wet cardboard. He often looks like a homeless man who happened to wander onto the field and find himself in a Red Sox uniform. Not hot.

The dead sea lamprey is greenish, mottled, and glistening. He has 7 breathing holes in his body, a powerful caudal tail, and a powerful rasping mouth. Probably pretty hot if you're into that kind of thing.

EDGE: Graffanino

Obviously, if Theo were truly dedicated to fielding the best team he possibly can, he would sign that dead sea lamprey immediately and stick him at second base. Despite his rotting smell, he would probably be instantly more affable than Mark Bellhorn.

Categories: Guest Columns

PREVIOUS: I'm on Fire ... Brand

NEXT: Manny Ramirez trading Beans for Apples?

Discussion

16 Comments on "Bellhorn vs. Graffanino vs. Lamprey"

Posted by Boston Fan in Michigan, July 29, 2005 12:05 AM

Jen, he probably could! Lock 'em in while they're still young and cheap, that's what I say. And I don't know, he's got, as they say, a rubber arm... might be fine for double plays. ;)

Ian, I'm glad I caused you all that breakfast distress. My work here is done.

Beth: SCIENCE!

Posted by Annette, July 29, 2005 12:20 AM

I noticed a flaw in your analysis though. Where would the guys rank in fielding? Bellhorn turns a good double play though his range isn't terribly great. Graffanino is quite new but seems good with the glove. But the dead sea lampry? Does he even have a glove? Wouldn't he just get smooshed to bits if he had to field?

Perhaps the dead sea lampry would make a good back-up DH.

Posted by Boston Fan in Michigan, July 29, 2005 12:59 AM

Good point Annette. The problem with the dead sea lamprey's fielding isn't his lack of glove... after all, his rasping mouth would work just as well. His issue is lack of range, and a woeful reaction time.

You know, I just had a look, and Bellhorn's lifetime fielding percentage at 2B is .979. Graffanino's lifetime fielding percentage at 2B is... .979. I give the slight edge to Bellhorn, just on the basis that I've seen him more and at least know what to expect.

The post still stands, though, and the dead sea lamprey is clearly the best choice here.

Posted by Jen, July 29, 2005 9:15 AM

I bet Theo could sign the dead sea lamprey for pretty cheap, too! But I must admit some concern about the DSLs abilities on the double play.

Posted by Ian C., July 29, 2005 10:19 AM

I'm about to choke on my morning bagel while reading this. Or short out my laptop by spitting coffee on it. Hilarious. Well done, Samuel, well done.

Posted by beth, July 29, 2005 10:30 AM

//the dead sea lamprey would have around 5.//

how did you arrive at these conclusions?

Posted by akaellen, July 29, 2005 1:15 PM

HILARIOUS!

Posted by Andrew, July 29, 2005 2:38 PM

All of this may be true, but I've heard bad things about the lamprey's clubhouse presence... We are, after all, talking about a parasitic fish that injects an anti-coagulant into its prey's bloodstream... and this team needs more coagulation, not less. I'd rathr see the team acquire a more team-player type fish. Maybe a carp.

Posted by Boston Fan in Michigan, July 29, 2005 2:45 PM

Man, Andrew, don't talk about stuff you clearly don't understand! Have you ever been teammates with a dead sea lamprey? You don't know how he is in the lockerroom! Maybe his teammates are OK with the parasitism.... it's just the dead sea lamprey being a dead sea lamprey!

(and it is SO not a fish) ;)

#10

Posted by Andrew, July 29, 2005 6:34 PM

I talked to two anonymous veteran tuna just this morning. Frankly, they're just as tired of the lamprey as I am... In fact, one of them went on to say "That Sam person never holds him accountable. I've never seen a lamprey get such a free pass. You all think it's a joke, 'The lamprey being the lamprey.' What is ''The lamprey being the lamprey?' Him bloodsucking our backup catcher?"

#11

Posted by PudgeforPrez, July 29, 2005 7:26 PM

You're both missing the point... who cares if he's bloodsucking in the clubhouse or not? We've got big guys on the team, they're major leaguers, they can spare a pint or two. The point is that the dead sea lamprey is PUTTING UP THE NUMBERS. Who cares if he's bloodsucking all the damn time and twice on Sundays when his OBP is that good?

Honestly. The game is advancing beyond those stone-age, 'that fish looks good in a hat' recruitement methods. Haven't you seen the Oakland A's? They've succeeded with a team of nothing BUT dead sea lampreys in the field sometimes!

#12

Posted by Sam, July 29, 2005 8:28 PM

This is all too much for me. I mean, don't get me wrong, it's a riot, but ... well, for once, I don't have anything to say except that I think any sort of edible acquatic life should immeiately be excluded from all trade discussions. After all, with all the paunch on this Red Sox team, not to mention all the GIDP's, it's pretty clear that this team knows how to eat like World Champions. That being the case, an edible teammate would probably not last very long in our clubhouse.

Which is another notch for the lamprey, I guess. I dunno, anybody ever try to eat one of those things? How would you cook it? I'm guessing battered & baked -- to cover some of the taste.

#13

Posted by Boston Fan in Michigan, July 30, 2005 2:09 AM

I would not recommend eating a dead sea lamprey. Then again, this is a team with David Wells and Kevin Millar on it, so anything is possible and perhaps it's something we would need to consider closely.

#14

Posted by Bellhorn At Bat, August 5, 2005 5:00 PM

Hilarious! As you might guess from my URL, I'm biased in this debate, but I really can't fathom how anyone can look at Graffanino's mug and give him the edge in hotness. You must really love the, erm, ethnic look. Bellhorn is nondescript looking, except for that perpetual "Pigpen" thing. I would say neither gets any points in the "hotness" category.

#15

Posted by Stankyfish, August 9, 2005 9:43 AM

I heard the Yankees are on the verge of inking a 4 year deal with the dead sea lamprey worth $80M.

#16

Posted by dead sea salt, August 10, 2005 2:32 PM

Great Point!
Dead Sea Cosmetics
Dead Sea Salt
Dead Sea Bath Salt
Dead Sea Mud
Dead Sea Cosmetics
Dead Sea Salts
Bulk Dead Sea Salt
Dead Sea Products
Dead Sea Salt Wholesale
Wholesale Dead Sea Salt
Dead Sea Minerals
Dead Sea Beauty Products
Dead Sea Skin Care
Dead Sea Mud Mask
Dead Sea Salt Psoriasis Cream
Purchase Dead Sea Salts
Dead Salt Sea
Unprocessed Dead Sea Salt
Dead Sea Salt Treatments
Dead Sea Salt Scrub
Dead Sea Salt Cosmetics
Dead Sea Mineral Cosmetics
Dead Sea Premier
Dead Sea Skin Care