| JON LESTER’S 2006 SEASON TO DATE |
|
Game by Game Log of Jon Lester
(All but 6/10 in AAA)
|
|
DATE
|
OPP
|
DEC
|
IP
|
H
|
R
|
ER
|
HR
|
BB
|
K
|
ERA
|
PC
|
|
4/10
|
ROC
|
L
|
2.1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
3.86
|
59
|
|
4/15
|
CHR
|
L
|
4.0
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
12.46
|
60
|
|
4/20
|
DUR
|
L
|
4.0
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
6
|
8.64
|
65
|
|
4/26
|
DUR
|
L
|
3.1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
6.94
|
59
|
|
5/01
|
OTT
|
ND
|
5.0
|
.3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5.94
|
81
|
|
5/06
|
ROC
|
W
|
5.0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
4.57
|
69
|
|
5/11
|
SYR
|
W
|
5.0
|
6
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
4.05
|
76
|
|
5/17
|
BUF
|
ND
|
5.2
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
3.34
|
92
|
|
5/23
|
LOU
|
W
|
5.0
|
.3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
3.13
|
84
|
|
5/28
|
NOR
|
ND
|
5.1
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
.295
|
89
|
|
6/05
|
IND
|
ND
|
4.0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
3
|
2.70
|
85
|
|
6/10
|
TEX
|
ND
|
4.1
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
4.15
|
101
|
|
Well, we did lose the game yesterday, but we saw the arrival of the much heralded Jon Lester – the next Andy Pettitte, the next Mark Mulder, the possible Once In A Generation pitcher that we have in our minor league system. Lester couldn’t get out of the fifth in his first start (shades of David Pauley) but did pitch enough for us to come away with two notable facts.
Jon Lester needs to work on his control. This much is evident. There is no mistaking the fact that the umpire shrank the strike zone on Lester, but this is common for rookies. A big-league umpire is not supposed to deviate from strike zones, but it’s long been known that an established major league pitcher will get calls that rookies will not (and vice versa for hitters) – and that it’s all part of coming of age in the big leagues. Even if Lester had the strike zone that Greg Maddux or Tom Glavine has, this would still be point number one on the To-Do List for Jon Lester. His very first pitch in the big-leagues was a high and wide fastball sailing up and away from a right-handed batter – Varitek had to leap for it.
I do realize that this first pitch had a lot riding on it – the first pitch in the gol’darned big leagues, boy! Nevertheless, it showed what was to come. Lester needs to firm up his pitches, tighten up his command, if he wants to be successful in the major leagues. This is major sticking point number one towards even staying in the major leagues. If he never develops this command, he’s going to have a Bruce Chen career.
I will be the first to admit that at least it’s a career, but I’m sure you know what I’m referring to when I call it a Bruce Chen career. If not, Chen had a lot of promise when he was first called up, and saw that turn into bouncing around the major leagues with flashes of brilliance showing up, but never for too long. Passing through Boston, Chen eventually wound up in Baltimore in 2004 and impressed in 47.2 IP to turn in a 13-10, 3.83 line last year. He’s falling apart this year.
Lester coughed up 25 walks in AAA to go along with 43 strikeouts. That’s a 1.72 K/BB ratio. For comparison, Curt Schilling is at 8.56 and Josh Beckett is at 2.39. We do know that Beckett is a lot better than he’s currently showing, but we also know that his 2.39 K/BB is not helping matters. Last year, it was at 2.86, but of course, he gave up a total of 14 homeruns all of last year. Right now, he’s clocked at 16, and all are mystifyingly on the road. One must be led to believe that this low K/BB of 2.39 does not go hand in hand with the spike in home runs well. More runners on base and more home runs equal disaster.
Okay, so we’ve established that his control has to be worked on. What about his stuff? Well, Jon Lester has the stuff. With his fastball solidly at 93-94 mph, it’s major league caliber. Also fine is his curveball, which while not 12-6, is still a good complement to his fastball and can garner outs. He also threw his cutter, which he started developing in 2005, for strikes. He also features a changeup, but to be honest, the only two pitches that stood out to me were his fastball and his curve, which shows you that these are the only two true major-league caliber pitches so far, although I’ve heard reports that his cutter was working well last night.
Jon Lester does have the stuff, but he has to feature his stuff more consistently. He needs to do better with regards to pitch count. If you look at the chart, his pitch count is consistently in the 80s and 90s, and he isn’t even past the fifth inning yet! This is a huge red flag showing us that Jon Lester is simply not ready for the major leagues.
However, he’s likely to remain in the starting rotation. Who knows, maybe with a week’s preparation, he’ll shine in his next outing like David Pauley did, but he’s still exhibiting the same command issues that he did in AAA. Pauley is likely to be sent down to AAA once Mike Timlin comes off the DL on Tuesday or Wednesday (and incidentally, Pauley is scheduled to start the second game on Sunday). Lester is scheduled to pitch Thursday at Minnesota on national TV, ESPN2. Lester may be up for good because David Wells looks no closer to returning, and closer to retirement. The prevailing question surrounding Wells is why his knee is not getting any better if it’s only a deep bone bruise.
We may be seeing a lot of Jon Lester to come, but I for one would prefer to see him optioned back to AAA, see Pauley get his longman work in today and return to the rotation. With Pauley’s sinker, I think he’s a much better short term fix than Lester. Lester can head back to Pawtucket armed with a major league start’s knowledge, and keep on working to refine his command.
The only thing better than that would be to see David Wells return and give us what he gave in 2005, or to see us acquire a midlevel starter to insert into the #5 hole and allow us to send both Lester and Pauley to the minors. We’d be taking a risk on him being the next Jeff Suppan, but that is a risk we need to take, I think. We simply cannot count on Lester and Pauley right now (unless Pauley keeps turning in outings like he did in the Bronx) but we’re going to have to until this David Wells situation pans out and the trade market asserts itself.
Until then, I’ll be happy watching a bonafide Sox-bred minor league phenom try to do well in the major leagues. It’s been way too long since we could say that.
![]()
Great points. I’m hoping that some of Jon’s instability yesterday was do to the mounting pressure as the minutes of waiting became an hour, then two, three, four. That must have been tough on him.
I’d rather stick with Pauley and Lester over trading for a Jeff Suppan-ish starter thanks. Getting a pitcher of Suppan-ish quality (who was doing well for Pitt at the time) would probably COST us a David Pauley anyhow. Not a good trade.
The only way it’d be prudent to look for outside help would be if you could grab a pitcher that would have a long term positive effect on the rotation more than what a David Pauley could offer long term.
You also can’t begin to say how much our defense let him down last night. He got through the second inning unscathed but threw 14 more pitches than he should have if our defense stepped up. That’s a whole extra inning of work. It also allows that bit of rest in between inning in which pitchers can gas up again.
Tough situation we’re in. But I also don’t see how dropping Lester back down to AAA will help him at this point. He needs to face the real thing and we can only hope it works. Gutsy call. The Yankees have gone this way and it’s been paying off for them.
Agreed. Mr. Pauley has what it takes. I think. And what better way to find out than throwing him out there in hallowed gound, that round mound in the center of Fenway Park. And maybe, or more like probably, with Youk in left. Just for game 2, after Manny hits a couple out. That’s my ideal scenario. Fiction now…fact later?
Suppose that the Suppan trade netted us someone who CONTINUED that Pittsburgh dominance? Costing us pauley? Probably, but don’t you think that Pauley seems to be topping out as another Suppan? Would you rather a veteran Suppan rather than a rookie Suppan? It’s all relative. Besides, Peter said it all… “Agreed. Mr. Pauley has what it takes. I think.”
Think. He thinks. We think. We don’t know.
No. I’d rather a rookie that wold perform as well as a veteran any old day.
Maybe your question should be more specific?
Why the love of a veteran? And a NL veteran doesn’t impress me just because they’re having 1/2 a good season.
considering long term also, where will that veteran be at the end of the season? Your team still has that rookie for several more years.
Pauley’s proving my point – you essentially know what you’re getting with that veteran, as there is precedent for what they’ve done. You have a reasonable expectation of the stats they will put up if you acquire them. A rookie, like Pauley, is vastly unpredictable. Check out his games so far, and the fact he’s given up 4 runs in 2.2 IP so far against the Rangers. We simply don’t know what Pauley can give us from game to game.