January 11, 2007 at 12:01 AM

25-35 saves for Pineiro?

You probably noticed that Fire Brand has something new - polls. The first poll is now closed, and the question was "How many games will Joel Pineiro save?"

The results are:

25-35, but be an average closer

39% of all votes

Maybe ten, because he'll flame out

28% of all votes

None, he won't start as a closer

23% of all votes

Be one of the better closers in the game

10% of all votes

In a nutshell, we're not expecting much out of Pineiro. I voted for "25-35, but be an average closer" which actually won the vote (though by not much, and lost if you combine the "maybe ten" and "none" votess) because that's essentially what will happen if Pineiro pitches as a closer the entire season, despite the ERA. In 2004, a pitcher saved 35 games while pitching a 7.11 ERA. That pitcher is Shawn Chacon. It just goes to show you how easy saves are to come by. He blew nine of those saves, giving him a 80 percent success rate and a SIP of 0.55.

The majority of the people feel that Pineiro can be an average closer and save 25-35 games. There were four people tied with 24 saves in 2006 (nobody had 25). They were: Takashi Saito of the Dodgers, Mike Gonzalez of the Pirates, Derrick Turnbow of the Brewers and Ryan Dempster of the Cubs. Their ERA's in order: 2.07, 2.17, 6.87, 4.80. The next person with less than 30 saves was Chad Cordero, who finished with a 3.19 ERA. Jonathan Papelbon finished with exactly 35 saves and a 0.92 ERA. In between Papelbon and Cordero (the list is here) were eight people, and here's how their ERAs finished from Papelbon to Cordero: 3.34, 1.80, 2.67, 3.55, 2.73, 5.28 (Brad Lidge), 2.11, 3.44.

The highest ERA belonged to Derrick Turnbow, who clearly lost his job. The next highest ERA was Brad Lidge, who temporarily lost his job before regaining it. You then have Dempster, who closed all year but is not exactly held in the highest esteem of Cubs fans. He did, nonetheless, notch 24 saves. The next highest ERA belonged to Jason Isringhausen and Brian Fuentes. The last person over 3.00 was Tom Gordon.

Essentially, we're looking for Joel Pineiro to be Jason Isringhausen - the 2006 Isringhausen, not the 2001-2005 Isringhausen. If Pineiro can pull up 35 saves with an ERA around 3.50, I'll be happy. For the record, Isringhausen blew four saves and went 4-8.

Eric Karabell penned a lengthy article on the Pineiro fantasy implications the other day. It's Insider only, but here are a few juicy pieces:

Pineiro does throw hard, he's still relatively young (only 28), and even if there was room for him in the rotation, does he deserve the chance? He's failed as a starter the last two seasons, and in a sweet pitcher's park and sans pressure. You know who else couldn't hack it every fifth day in nice ballparks? Eric Gagne couldn't stick in the Dodgers' top five, and was moved to the bullpen by necessity, because of health and the fact he was out of chances to start. Joe Nathan was hardly a giant when the Giants asked him to start. He stunk. Then he had one terrific middle relief season there and got thrown into the Francisco Liriano-Boof Bonser-A.J. Pierzynski deal and has been arguably baseball's best closer since then. Nobody thought moving these guys to the ninth inning would make them Cy Young caliber.

There is no blueprint for what a closer needs to save games, other than, obviously and in general, they need the ball with a lead of three runs or fewer in the ninth inning. Don't even look at Pineiro's 2006 stats. They tell us little. I looked, of course, and saw that his ERA as a starter was two runs higher than it was in relief, and that his strikeout rate was solid when moved to the bullpen. Batters hit only .213 off him when he was relieving, though it's a small sample size. But nothing has truly prepared this guy to close. Pitching in the sixth inning while losing 90 games in Seattle is not the same as pitching in the ninth inning at Fenway or Yankee Stadium, with a man on base, tens of thousands of angry, demanding fans yelling at you and someone like Derek Jeter at the plate. There's pressure. Not everyone can close, even those with a great arm and nasty stuff. If that was the case, Kyle Farnsworth might be Lee Smith. He's not. Joe Borowski has multiple big save seasons. This is about opportunity.

Pineiro was once a very highly regarded pitcher, and he won 16 games in 2003 with a 3.78 ERA and 151 strikeouts. His 2004 was cut short by an elbow injury, and his shoulder was hurt early in 2005. Since then he's been among the most hittable pitchers in the game, and with a low strikeout rate. But when Pineiro went to the bullpen last year, he was better. In his words, "it was something where I came in and gave it all I had for one inning. ... I dropped down my arm angle a little bit, the ball had more movement. I was very excited about it." Kudos to the Sox for doing their homework.

Does this make me excited? No. It doesn't at all. It does ease my concerns a bit. Even if Pineiro is average, won't that help us? Not only have we not had many "average" relievers in a while, but Pineiro being "average" will allow someone else to step in if we can find an improvement, as Tristan Cockcroft notes on that page:

If he starts slowly, I expect another trade like the one for Byung-Hyun Kim in 2003. Or, perhaps Craig Hansen starts strong in a setup role and gets promoted. Why isn't that being called as likely a possibility as Pineiro succeeding in the closer spot?

Why isn't it, indeed. A trade is likely. Hansen or Manny Delcarmen moving into the slot is likely.

The only thing guaranteed right now is that Pineiro has the inside track to closing. If he bombs, we switch him out immediately. We're not beholden to a guy not expected to succeed who is in his first year of relieving. Even the organization isn't turning cartwheels. If he's average, we can either leave him there or easily justify removing him from the spot. If he excels, great.

I simply don't see anything to lose here. I do not see Pineiro as another Rudy Seanez. If Pineiro bombs, he will not continue getting chances.

In other news, Jim Rice didn't make the Hall of Fame. I'm hearing that now 2008 is his best year! He won't have Ripken or Gwynn to contend with, people will be upset over Bonds breaking the record, casting even more positive light on Rice, and he'll be in his last gasps to get elected by the writers ... I'll believe it when I see it.

J.D. Drew's contract apparently will be done soon. Really? It was going to be done soon on November 29th.

A new poll up there, folks. Vote on it! Interesting question, too. When will Jacoby Ellsbury make his major league debut? Think about it.

Categories: Jim Rice, Joel Pineiro

PREVIOUS: Red Sox Redux

NEXT: Random Thoughts

Discussion

9 Comments on "25-35 saves for Pineiro?"

#1

user-pic

Posted by RH, January 11, 2007 1:13 AM

Re: Drew...

I've heard a few different things regarding Drew, from the deal being shortened to 4-years for the same money with a 5th year option if Drew plays 120+ games in each of the 4, to a 5-year deal for $60M plus incentives.

The Globe and Herald both reported that a source "close to the negotiations" -- whatever that means -- said it could be done soon, possibly by Friday.

Nice post, Evan -- love that you're giving us some of the "Insider" info! Every good article -- except Bill Simmons and GeneWoj of course -- on ESPN is Insider now...I hate them for it.

The polls are a great idea...just voted for Ellsbury in September...

Thanks

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Sean O, January 11, 2007 11:11 AM

My prediction for Pineiro:

6.29 ERA, 1-4 record, 8 SV, 5 BS

If he can manage that. Making him the closer is a totally unacceptable move. Say what you will about the inherent inefficiencies used in bullpen management, you still need a shutdown arm in the pen.

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by Mike Edelman, January 11, 2007 1:16 PM

I personally am very disappointed in the move to try Pineiro as a closer. Epstein has been so bad at putting bullpen's together that it's almost as if he's given up on trying anymore. I'm not going to be at all happy when the Red Sox have a lead and we're throwing Donnelly, Timlin and Pineiro out there.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by RH, January 11, 2007 1:19 PM

I still think we're going to get another reliever at some point, either via trade (David Murphy), or free agency. I heard the Sox looked into Schoeneweis, but he's a Met now. There's not much else to be excited about free agent-wise, but a couple of teams are still looking for a centerfielder, so a trade could land us a decent 'pen arm.

Reply

#5

user-pic

Posted by Dave B, January 11, 2007 1:44 PM

I just don't understand the love or even appeal to Pineiro. I would much rather one of the kids to have his spot, at least we aren't giving them 4 million bucks. Lets hope for once that Theo is right about a pen arm.

Reply

#6

user-pic

Posted by RH, January 11, 2007 1:56 PM

Actually, in this case, it's whether Allard Baird is right or wrong. Baird scouted Pineiro extensively and said he has the potential to be a shut-down reliever, which is why the Sox signed him.

If Pineiro doesn't work out, Theo isn't the main guy to blame.

Reply

#7

user-pic

Posted by Sam, January 11, 2007 2:00 PM

My dream scenario is that our OF stays relatively healthy and both Coco and Ellsbury perform well -- Coco well enough to raise his trade value, and Ellsbury well enough to merit a promotion to Boston. Best of all possible worlds there.

Reply

#8

user-pic

Posted by Mike Edelman, January 11, 2007 4:17 PM

I'm not so sure that Ellsbury will be making the majors at all next year. He's yet to play in AAA and all the estimates I've heard have him pegged to make the majors in mid-2008. I'd be surprised if Theo wasn't planning on waiting until the trade deadline to pick up relievers though. There will be plenty of available ones then and the Red Sox have the trade bait to land them.

Reply

#9

user-pic

Posted by RH, January 11, 2007 6:23 PM

The problem with waiting until the deadline to trade for a reliever is that the Sox will wind up with 6 outfielders on the roster, if you count Eric Hinske and David Murphy. Certainly, David Murphy could start in AAA, but I think the Sox ought to do him a favor and trade him to a team where he could be a major leaguer, rather than send him to Pawtucket for another year.

The Marlins and Rangers are both still interested in Murphy, and I've heard the Giants mentioned as well, though they have no relievers to trade.

The Sox are apparently still interested in Dustin Hermanson -- he's a bargain at this point, especially since he wouldn't cost them any draft picks. Unfortunately, we have too many relievers as it is...

Reply

Leave a comment