Fire Brand of the American League
  • RSS :
  • Posts
  • Comments
  • Email
  • Home
  • Team of the Decade
  • Authors
  • Depth Chart
  • Interviews
  • Store

The Fall of Jason Varitek?

August 22nd, 2007 by Evan Brunell
  • 195314 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2007/08/22/the-fall-of-jason-varitek.htmlThe+Fall+of+Jason+Varitek%3F2007-08-22+04%3A01%3A50Evan+Brunell
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Previous
  • Next

One of the lesser talked about mates of the Red Sox this year has been Jason Varitek, which is curious considering that he’s making a large chunk of money and is, according to several different sources, the most important member of the Red Sox right now.

The last time we talked about Varitek, it was May 9th and I was wondering if it was the end of the line for Tek. I said:

His numbers on the season prior to last nightǃÙs game: .240/.318/.347. That is worse than his 2006 season, which is the season that raised many concerns among Red Sox fans, after he finished at .238/.325/.400 in 103 games, his lowest total since 2001, when he broke his elbow diving for a foul ball.

Since then, Varitek has quieted the rumbling to the point that we’ve simply stopped noticing him. I’ve noticed a lack of publicity — good or bad — about Varitek this year, which means he’s doing enough to not warrant criticism, but not doing enough to be thrust in the forefront.

Here are his month by month statistics, followed by his cumulative line:

April – .239/.325/.358
May – .311/.416/.541
June – .234/.322/.403
July – .294/.398/.368
August – .241/.317/.352
Cumulative – .265/.359/.409 (.229/.336/.333 since the All-Star Break)

This is not good. He seems to alternate good months with bad, but even his good months aren’t that good. It’s plainly obvious: Varitek has lost all semblance of power. If he continues on his current progression, he is projected to finish the season with 18 doubles, four triples, 14 HR and 71 RBI. His 18 doubles would be the lowest since his 11 in his injury-shortened 2001, and his 13 in 221 AB in his rookie year for the Red Sox. In other words: the lowest of any year in which he appeared in at least 100 games.

His homers would be his third lowest, and that’s with him on pace to appear in 137 games. He had 12 homers in 103 games last year. If you throw out last year, it will be his lowest tally since 2002, when he was recovering from a broken elbow and 2000, the year before he busted out. Let’s look at triples. Believe it or not, he’s already set a career season-high for triples with three. Go figure, huh? His RBIs are staying around the norm, basically because he’s always hit sixth or seventh in the order (over 1,000 at-bats in these spots).

All in all, his OPS will check in at .768, which is better than last year (thanks to the horrific .238 average last year). Factoring in his injury-marred 2001 season and rookie year, it will be his fifth lowest OPS.

Here’s how good Varitek was and could have been: if he hadn’t been hurt in 2001, which definitely contributed to his subpar 2002 and he posted a “normal” stat line that he did in 2001 and 2003-5, he would have had five straight seasons of OPS’ around .860. For comparison’s sake, only Jorge Posada (talk about the contract year!) and Victor Martinez are out-OPSing .860.

I hate watching Jason Varitek these days, because it’s apparent he’s not capable of doing enough damage anymore. Look at the doubles total. 18. 18. Every starter has already passed 18, and only the bench players lag behind Varitek in this category.

Throughout all this, we need to remember something, though; even though his lack of production is stark considering his history and overall offensive contribution while factoring in other positions, he is still good enough to be one of only 11 catchers to qualify for the batting title. Of those 14, he ranks seventh in overall OPS. This means, offensively, he is the seventh best hitting catcher. Factor in his play-calling, his defense, his leadership … it’s easy to see why he’s considered the best, or at least in the top three, catcher in the game.

I suppose the point of this article is to just point out how much Varitek has tailed off offensively. He’s been the seven-hole hitter basically all year long, but I think that it’s time to start viewing him as the eight-hole hitter. However, it’s also important to realize that just by showing up to the park every day and being below average with the bat makes him an above average catcher. As for the things that are not easily quantified? The defense, pitch-calling, leadership? Off the charts, and coveted by many around the league. Current and former Red Sox players rave about Varitek. There’s a reason for this.

So, I’ve decided that the offense doesn’t matter to me. As long as he’s not a black hole (black hole: OPS under .700), I support Jason Varitek as a member of the Boston Red Sox. The one thing I can’t support, however, is his contract. $10 million a year is set aside for the creme de la creme, and Varitek jumped on that contract at the perfect time: coming off a World Series win and with one more great year left in the tank.

I am in no way advocating that we make Jason Varitek depart after his contract expires in 2008 … but his next contract better be a healthy cut under $10 million. A cut as in … cut in half.

To round out this post, I thought I’d rattle off the names of every principal catcher in the Sox system as sort of a glimpse into what we have in the pipeline should Varitek depart and we not plug the hole via trade:

AAA: George Kottaras (age 24), .237/.315/.400 (he’s been improving these numbers)
AA: John Otness (25), .197/.239/.240
Hi-A: Mark Wagner (23), .315/.405/.528 (this is in hitter-friendly Lancaster)
Mid-A: Jon Still (22), .292/.432/.542 (spending most of his time at 1B, just promoted to Hi-A)
Mid-A: Paul Smyth (24), .319/.357/.560 (just converted to catcher from the outfield)
Mid-A: Jon Egan (20), .201/.315/.402 (On the DL for much of 2007)
Low-A: Ty Weeden (19), .243/.311/.361

The only bright spot looks to be Still, and he’s going to end up a first baseman. Ouch.

The results of the poll that ask who should be our fifth hitter in our Fire Brand created lineup ended up not being even close. Mike Lowell ran away with the vote, getting 72 percent of all votes. J.D. Drew trailed, getting 20 percent, and Kevin Youkilis brought up the rear at seven percent. Youkilis’ horrific slump, which I will not talk about (la la la, can’t hear you), is definitely hurting his candidacy in this perfect lineup.

Next up is who bats… sixth! Is it J.D. Drew? Kevin Youkilis? Jason Varitek? Julio Lugo? You decide.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under George Kottaras, Jason Varitek, John Otness, Jon Egan, Jon Still, Mark Wagner, Paul Smyth, Ty Weeden
« « 8/22: Six and Counting
Sox keep it going » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

195314 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2007/08/22/the-fall-of-jason-varitek.htmlThe+Fall+of+Jason+Varitek%3F2007-08-22+04%3A01%3A50Evan+Brunell to “The Fall of Jason Varitek?”

  • mike says:
    August 22, 2007 at 12:32 AM

    Jorge Posada is having the best offensive season of his career. He’s one year older than varitek.

    Reply
  • kevin r says:
    August 22, 2007 at 9:52 AM

    I remember hearing good things about Ty Weeden, though those numbers certainly aren’t much to be excited about.
    It is looking like we’re going to be in trouble behind the plate in a couple years… I’ll keep my fingers crossed that Kottaras can break out suddenly or something.

    Reply
  • Jimmy says:
    August 22, 2007 at 10:37 AM

    He’s an aging catcher….what should we expect? I’ll take his pitch calling/staff-handling and his new-found ability to throw out baserunners over his hitting as long as he displays a modicum of power.

    Reply
  • jvwalt says:
    August 22, 2007 at 10:49 AM

    Varitek has held up longer than most catchers. Sox management decided not to offer long-term contracts to Johnny Damon and Pedro Martinez, and those clearly turned out to be correct decisions. They made the opposite call with Varitek. Given his value as a defensive catcher and captain, he retains more value than either Damon or Pedro, but he’s not a $10-million player anymore.
    Every time you sign a long-term deal with a 30-plus player, you’re risking a productivity decline and significantly reducing your flexibility (not only in payroll, but also in your ability to insert young players — like, for instance, Moss, Ellsbury, and Pena). The decision to cut ties with an older player can be very unpopular, but it’s often the right move.

    Reply
  • Troy says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:02 AM

    Tek is waving good-bye to the yankees in that picture.

    Reply
  • Troy says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:08 AM

    What about Posada next year..

    Reply
  • Giro says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:33 AM

    The ENTIRE team is hitting worse than ever before with the exception of Lowell and Pedroia who doesn’t even count as he was in the minors last year. It kills me that nobody has turned their attention on the hitting coach, Dave Magadan. He was fired by the Padres for sucking and was most definitely a crony pick up by Tito. All those years under Papa Jack and they hit lights out, but when an entire lineup falls by the wayside during the same season you can’t blame any one individual. Hitting coaches always seem to escape the blame until one member of the press brings it up and creates that “oh yeah” moment. Carlos Pena is having a monster season compared to Papi and Manny. Is anybody noticing this? It’s embarrassing.
    Without the pitching this season we’re a .500 ball club fighting to stay out of 5th place this year. It’s not fair to single out Tek on the offensive front. Given how good the pitching has been this season don’t you think Tek’s salary is worth keeping everyone in check? Who would you rather have? Tek at 10 mil or Michael Barrett at 4 mil? It’s a no-brainer.

    Reply
  • Derek says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:40 AM

    I 2nd Giro, most of the team is below average, except for Lowell and Pedroia (who knows what his average season will be). Was Mags known as a mechanically sound hitter? I remember him hitting about 300, maybe less, with little power. What makes him a batting coach?
    Tek is still a top catcher, based on presence/leadership alone.

    Reply
  • Shane says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:52 AM

    That is a good point about the hitting coach, why did they even change coaches?

    Reply
  • Evan Brunell says:
    August 22, 2007 at 2:22 PM

    They changed coaches because Papa Jack was starting to (this is all hearsay) get an attitude and wasn’t that willing to work with players that weren’t his friend or that needed work. He’d make them work out of their own slumps.

    Reply
  • Mr Furious says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:50 PM

    No need for Posada, he’s even older than Varitek, and he isn’t half the reciever.
    But Tek should be hitting eighth. It would be ninth, but I like having Lugo there…

    Reply
  • Danil says:
    August 23, 2007 at 12:19 AM

    “This means, offensively, he is the seventh best hitting catcher. Factor in his play-calling, his defense, his leadership

    Reply
  • FenFan says:
    August 23, 2007 at 12:39 AM

    As much as I’ve hated seeing Varitek’s bat kill us in the last couple of years, he’s well-respected by the pitching staff and has several other intangibles, as Jimmy states. If there are no viable options at that position within the organization or on the free agent / trade market, then it’s better to stick with him and hope that he still has gas in the tank. Given that the entire team’s offensive production is down, as pointed out by Giro, is it also reasonable to say that this change has had an effect, too?

    Reply
  • All-Aughts Team of the Decade C: Jason Varitek | Fire Brand of the American League says:
    November 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM

    [...] hold up over a full season was given in plenty of time for 2009. (Fire Brand archives: The Fall of Jason Varitek, 8/22/07; The end of the line for Varitek, [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.


Recent Posts

  • Ellsbury and the devil
  • Fireside Chats #72: Where we contemplate signing a one day contract with ESPN and retiring on top
  • Tim Wakefield returns to the bullpen
  • AL Central Sleepers
  • Pawtucket Red Sox manager Torey Lovullo eager to get started

Fire Brand Poll

What place will Boston finish in the division?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

  • radiohix on Ellsbury and the devil
  • Ipkiss on Tim Wakefield returns to the bullpen
  • Dtay on Ellsbury and the devil
  • went9 on Ellsbury and the devil
  • TroyPatterson on Ellsbury and the devil

Red Sox blogosphere

Fireside Chats Podcast

Search Fire Brand

Categories

Fire Brand Award


  • J.D. Drew
    2010 Fire Brand

Links

  • Find cheap MLB tickets including Boston Red Sox tickets NY Yankees tickets 2010 All-Star Game tickets and the Philadelphia Phillies schedule.
  • Find great deals on Boston Red Sox tickets from sports ticket broker Coast to Coast!
  • MLB Betting and Sports Betting Lines at the Internet’s Premier Sportsbook
  • Blogroll
  • Trivia
  • Twitter: Evan
  • Twitter: Fire Brand
  • Twitter: Tim
  • Advertorial: All Hail The Kings

Quotes

  • "It's amazing how many club officials read...Fire Brand of the American League." - Peter Gammons
  • "Run by Evan Brunell...this has perspective and weight to it that goes against the stereotype of the screaming Red Sox fan." - Deadspin
  • "For in-depth coverage and analysis of everything that happens with the Boston Red Sox, you can’t beat Fire Brand of the American League!" - David Pinto

Calendar

August 2007
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Fire Brand of the American League is proudly powered by WordPress. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) | Swift by Satish Gandham a product of SwiftThemes.Com