Fire Brand of the American League
  • RSS :
  • Posts
  • Comments
  • Email
  • Home
  • Team of the Decade
  • Authors
  • Depth Chart
  • Interviews
  • Store

Coco Crisp on verge of being traded to Mets?

March 12th, 2008 by Evan Brunell
  • 243324 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2008/03/12/coco-crisp-on-verge-of-being-traded-to-mets.htmlCoco+Crisp+on+verge+of+being+traded+to+Mets%3F2008-03-12+18%3A45%3A27Evan+Brunell
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Previous
  • Next

WFAN reports that Coco Crisp could be dealt to the New York Mets rather soon for outfielder Angel Pagan.
The Red Sox would be giving Crisp away on the cheap, but would likely make back what they would lose by not having an unhappy Crisp on the bench.
Pagan, who has played for the Cubs in the major leagues and acquired by the Mets this January, is a career .255/.306/.415 hitter in 318 AB who can play all outfield positions and do so without complaining. At 26 years of age, he would not be a significant dropoff offensively, but as of this moment, I do not know what Pagan’s defensive numbers are. Surely, the difference would be great only because Crisp is that good defensively.
Crisp would likely start off playing left field in the absence of Moises Alou.
Time will tell if this trade happens. If it does, however, you would have to color me disappointed. This is the best we can do? At least send a Double-A relief prospect our way too, for crying out loud!

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under Angel Pagan, Coco Crisp, New York Mets, Trades
« « Sudden Shocker: Red Sox release Doug Mirabelli
AL East stacked with ROTY candidates » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

243324 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2008/03/12/coco-crisp-on-verge-of-being-traded-to-mets.htmlCoco+Crisp+on+verge+of+being+traded+to+Mets%3F2008-03-12+18%3A45%3A27Evan+Brunell to “Coco Crisp on verge of being traded to Mets?”

  • Sam says:
    March 12, 2008 at 3:02 PM

    I don’t like the sound of any of these trade rumours … none of them seem to do anything positive for us and they are making me nervous about the market for Crisp … it really doesn’t look like anybody wants to give us much back … IMO we should hold on to him right
    Of course that brings up the other problem … are we hearing all these bad rumours because the Sox are being forced to listen a bunch of lowball offers because Crisp is demanding a trade? that make me more nervous … Are we trading Crisp now, at the most inopportune time, because he’d hurt us more by being a cancer in the clubhouse?
    I dunno … doesn’t sound like it can end well unless a team gives us a good offer or Crisp sucks it up for the team

    Reply
  • Daniel Rathman says:
    March 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM

    Sam:
    I agree…but with one caveat. There’s a very real possibility that Coco will complain nonstop about being a fourth outfielder, and then the Sox will be in desperation mode — they’d basically HAVE to trade him. At least this way, we’ll be able to keep Bobby Kielty, who I think will prove very valuable if Drew slumps.
    I doubt this would be a straight-up Coco-for-Pagan…I could see the Sox sending along some $$$ in exchange for a mid-caliber prospect.

    Reply
  • Moshe Mandel says:
    March 12, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    Newsday is reporting that there is no trade, and the Mets arent interested.

    Reply
  • Sam says:
    March 12, 2008 at 3:29 PM

    I’ve been in favor of keeping Crisp around as I think losing him would really hurt this team’s depth and defense (Kielty isn’t too bad but he doesn’t have the offensive upside/defense of Crisp) … plus we are working from a horrible position in any trade right now … but apparently the FO is worried enough about what Crisp can do to the clubhouse that they are going to listen to any offers
    As a fan I hate when players act like this … if Crisp had played like we expected when we got him he wouldn’t be the 4th outfielder now … but I’m sure that’s not what his agent is telling him
    whatever … let’s just hope if we have to trade him that we can’t get more than Jason Marquis or Angel Pagan

    Reply
  • Sam says:
    March 12, 2008 at 3:31 PM

    Thanks Moshe … good news … sorta … tho I would’ve been happier if it had been the Sox who weren’t interested lol

    Reply
  • Jaredk says:
    March 12, 2008 at 4:09 PM

    I wonder if Crisp is starting to wonder if he is better of sticking with the Sox at this point. Between the possibility of Ellsbury not getting it done and Manny/Drew being injury prone…I mean you got to think that reality is that there are not more then one or two fits where he would be the starter. I’m surprised the Braves are not more interested…I know they have Schaeffer and Gorky in the wings but they could both need two full years and Mark Kotsay is an injury waiting to happen…and is inferior defensively, and a wash out with the bat and could be worse…his last full year he had a .332 obp with 7 homeruns. Unless they would move Kelly Johnson to center and Lillibridge to 2b or something…it seems like it could be a fit.

    Reply
  • I'm A Jet says:
    March 12, 2008 at 5:32 PM

    Where’s Sean O? He’s usually pretty quick to use these fake rumors as an opportunity to bash Epstein.

    Reply
  • Psychic Fresh says:
    March 12, 2008 at 5:45 PM

    Don’t worry Sam, the Red Sox weren’t interested either. In fact, the reality of the situation is that the teams hadn’t even talked. Moshe saying that the deal didn’t happen because the Mets weren’t interested was just some more of Moshe’s revisionist history. Just like he said Joba simply let a pitch get away when he gave up a home run and drilled the next batter. Hell, he just wrote an article about how he’s excited that Shelly Duncan tried to spike Iwamura today.

    Reply
  • Radisson says:
    March 12, 2008 at 5:54 PM

    Any chance Kottaras could challenge for Mirabelli’s job?
    10 AB, .500/.538/1.000, HR, 2 2B, 4 RBI
    He could be primed for a breakout season. In ‘06 he hit .276/.394/.451 at Double A (consistent with the rest of is production to that point) before struggling at the Triple A level. Last year he hit .241/.316/.408 at the Triple A level, but wouldn’t that translate to a better offensive line than Mirabelli’s .202/.278/.360 last year? Plus, Kottaras has experience catching knuckleballer Steve Sparks.

    Reply
  • Vivianna says:
    March 12, 2008 at 7:59 PM

    Radisson,
    key point: “struggling at the Triple A level”; that’s super important when you’re talking about bringing someone up to the major…as well as experience, as in Mirabelli’s

    Reply
  • KnutKnows says:
    March 12, 2008 at 8:13 PM

    PRAISE BE THE DEAL FOR CRISP DID NOT GO THROUGH!
    I’m a Mets fan and there is now way I would trade Pagan right now even up for Crisp–please, Boston, keep him!
    Pagan has transformed his body through conditioning and has looked super!

    Reply
  • Sean O says:
    March 12, 2008 at 9:33 PM

    Yeah, but Gabe Kapler was one of the best looking baseball players I’ve ever seen. Only problem is, he sucks.
    If you’re a Mets fan who didn’t want this trade to go through… yeah, that would be odd. Even Pagan’s 90th percentile isn’t earth shattering.

    Reply
  • Ramon says:
    March 12, 2008 at 10:25 PM

    better no trade Angel pagan for coco crisc

    Reply
  • Radisson says:
    March 12, 2008 at 10:30 PM

    Viv, to be fair I’m sure Mirabelli would struggle at the Triple A level too at this point in his career. At least Kottaras is improving.

    Reply
  • Jessica Bader says:
    March 12, 2008 at 10:34 PM

    As a Mets fan, I’m disappointed that this rumor turned out not to be true. Sure, Pagan is on fire in Spring Training, but Spring Training stats really don’t mean anything, and as for his defense, well, I’ve begun to use “Pagan” as a verb meaning “to misplay a routine fly ball.” Crisp is not a great hitter, but he’s also not a guy who would be overexposed with regular playing time (the main problem with the Mets’ in-house options), and he’d get enough playing time on the Mets that I don’t think that would be an issue for him.

    Reply
  • Gerry says:
    March 12, 2008 at 11:20 PM

    The recent trade rumors to Oakland, Chicago, San Diego and Mets have Coco as an extra OF (supporting the A’s rebuild, platooning with Pie, and playing LF until Alou comes back . . . then what?)
    Would he want that? Would the Sox want to trade him for lesser players that we absolutely don’t need? Answer to both questions is NO!!!
    Tito started ST saying Coco is our CF. Coco isn’t starting because he is hurt, pure and simple. As stated above, he knows that Jacoby may need more AAA, that JD or Manny could get hurt. He also knows Sox fans understand and appreciate his D, his SB, and know his offense will return. He has plenty of reason to choose to stay, especially in a superior 4-man OF with Repeat in mind.
    Could rumors of Coco’s potential to be the feared “cancer in the clubhouse” be just rumors, bolstered by a couple of pre-ST bravado statements? When he reads stuff like this, does he wonder where it’s coming from? Are we over reacting? Are we supporting a harmful rumor? Could be.

    Reply
  • Sean O says:
    March 12, 2008 at 11:53 PM

    Gerry- A+. So completely true. Coco was unbelievably good last year in the field, with an 8.4 WARP. That’s.. really great.
    He should start. What will we gain by starting Jacoby now and letting Coco go for nothing? As a random comparison, Ortiz had an 8.8 WARP in 2006.
    Coco is good.

    Reply
  • WAC says:
    March 12, 2008 at 11:59 PM

    lol, come on Sean. Even you must realize that’s because Ortiz is a DH. Talk about using stats to manipulate an argument.

    Reply
  • Sean O says:
    March 13, 2008 at 12:17 AM

    Good god, you people will do anything to twist my words. Obviously Ortiz’s WARP is due to him being a DH, but regardless, value is value. Beckett had an 8 WARP this year, Damon had an 8 WARP in 2004. It is the sign of a very, very good season.
    Soriano, one of the most highly paid players in the game has had 3 8+ WARP years. Manny has only had one 8+ WARP year since 1999 (though several were very close).
    Crisp is valuable.

    Reply
  • Evan Brunell says:
    March 13, 2008 at 7:39 AM

    Let’s keep the discussion to the topic and Red Sox at hand and refrain from personal attacks on commenters, please. Sean’s point is valid. Ortiz is a DH. I’m not trying to presume that Coco is as valuable as Papi at the plate, but the game isn’t just about offense.
    I appreciate all the new comments and welcome more discourse, but not at the expense of civility.

    Reply
  • Dave B. says:
    March 13, 2008 at 8:54 AM

    Using WARP-3 is stupid. The adjustments are dumb in context of discussing Crisp.
    To say Crisp is extremely valuable is dumb. Yes, he has value but come on. First off, WARP stinks because BPs fielding stats are bad. A guy like Crisp gets too much credit. Second, he isn’t what we saw last year. For arguements sack i’ll stick with BP stats. Prior to 07 he had a career FRAA of +10. He was +27 last year. Would you call Jack Cust extremely valuable b/c of one great year of hitting?
    The fact of the matter is Crisp was a stud in the field last year and only last year. Does one year of amazing D make up for his .240 and .247 EqA the past 2 years?

    Reply
  • Sean O says:
    March 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM

    Well, Dave, let’s look at this train of thought. In LF, he hate a Rate2 of 116, 124 and 113 before the move to Boston. Then, after an adjustment year back to CF in 2006 (while injured), he brought it all together in CF.
    I don’t look at Rate2 exclusively, just like I don’t look at any stat exclusively. I know that Melky’s Rate2 is a mirage, but Coco is backed up by extremely good UZRs and (to me, most importantly) fielding bible scores.
    Also, Crisp hasn’t been valuable for just one year. Let’s play devil’s advocate and agree with Crisp that he’s been battling nagging injuries and is finally healthy. If we can get a .280/.350/.450 line like his last few years in Cleveland, we’re in excellent shape.

    Reply
  • Sean O says:
    March 13, 2008 at 10:44 AM

    meant *had* a rate2 in that first line. I was having a conversation about geraldine ferraro at the same time, so that kinda seeped in.

    Reply
  • Dave B. says:
    March 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM

    He is obviously a good defender. He is probably a top 5 CFer maybe top 3. That being said, without looking it up i think his career EqA is .255. Above the numbers i mentioned above but still below average. Considering he is making 10M the next 2 years he isn’t worth much. If i was a team trading for him I’d give up a bullpen arm/ bench player + C prospect. Or a B prospect. Something along the lines of a Gallagher or Castillo from the Cubs or an Inma or Carrillo from the Padres.
    I still think a trade of Lowrie + Crisp for Fuentes + Morillo type deal would be great. It wont happen but i think that would be great for both teams.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.


Recent Posts

  • All-Aughts Team of the Decade Dishonorable Mention Vote
  • AL East Sleepers: Baltimore Orioles
  • Super Advertising Sporting Event Squares
  • Remembering Nomar Garciaparra in Boston
  • Is Clay Buchholz’s change-up responsible for lefty struggles?

Fire Brand Poll

Who should be on the All-Aughts Team of the Decade as dishonorable mention?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

  • Ace on All-Aughts Team of the Decade Dishonorable Mention Vote
  • evanbrunell on All-Aughts Team of the Decade Dishonorable Mention Vote
  • Aaron on All-Aughts Team of the Decade Dishonorable Mention Vote
  • dudejimi on AL East Sleepers: Baltimore Orioles
  • Dan on All-Aughts Team of the Decade Dishonorable Mention Vote

Red Sox blogosphere

Fireside Chats Podcast

Search Fire Brand

Categories

Fire Brand Award


  • J.D. Drew
    2010 Fire Brand

Links

  • Find cheap MLB tickets including Boston Red Sox tickets NY Yankees tickets 2010 All-Star Game tickets and the Philadelphia Phillies schedule.
  • Find great deals on Boston Red Sox tickets from sports ticket broker Coast to Coast!
  • MLB Betting and Sports Betting Lines at the Internet’s Premier Sportsbook
  • Blogroll
  • Trivia
  • Twitter: Evan
  • Twitter: Fire Brand
  • Twitter: Tim
  • Advertorial: All Hail The Kings

Quotes

  • "It's amazing how many club officials read...Fire Brand of the American League." - Peter Gammons
  • "Run by Evan Brunell...this has perspective and weight to it that goes against the stereotype of the screaming Red Sox fan." - Deadspin
  • "For in-depth coverage and analysis of everything that happens with the Boston Red Sox, you can’t beat Fire Brand of the American League!" - David Pinto

Calendar

March 2008
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Fire Brand of the American League is proudly powered by WordPress. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) | Swift by Satish Gandham a product of SwiftThemes.Com