In Case Of Emergency: Barry Lamar

July 9th, 2008 by Zach Hayes

While the Nation holds their breath in anticipation of a David Ortiz return slated to begin around the end of the month, there still lies the possibility our Papi will never be able to find his pre-wrist injury form. The two sessions of batting practice prior to the last couple games against Minnesota have gone swimmingly, surely a positive start on the road to recovery. But, if you recall, Curt Schilling

  • Share/Bookmark
 Filed under Barry Bonds
« « POLL: Determining home-field for World Series
BOS 5, MIN 4: Manny clutch again » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

4 Comments to “In Case Of Emergency: Barry Lamar”

  • Evan Brunell says:
    July 9, 2008 at 7:38 AM

    Yeah, it makes sense to discuss it internally, but that’s as far as it should go.
    Bonds is no Randy Moss. Have you heard from him this off-season? No. He hasn’t been contrite, nothing like that. If anything, he’s dug his heels in further. He insists he didn’t lie to the grand jury (which I can’t determine if he did that or not, but he’s not out there proclaiming his innocence either) and he refused to give in to any team in the off-season until he realized that “Gee, maybe I really AM not wanted” and then went on the offensive.
    He can hit, but the baggage he brings is terrible. No.

    Reply
  • Jc says:
    July 9, 2008 at 9:55 AM

    http://hackswithhaggs.com/2008/07/09/gammons-variteks-contract-status-could-become-a-problem.aspx#Comment
    interesting comments from Gammons, according to him, Manny was fined for his actions.

    Reply
  • Tim Starks says:
    July 9, 2008 at 5:49 PM

    I favor complete isolation of the cheateriest of the cheaters who cheated his way to the most storied record in our national pastime. Punish punish punish.

    Reply
  • Ryan Hoffman says:
    July 9, 2008 at 6:09 PM

    From a strictly Ws and Ls standpoint, on paper Bonds looks good, but when you look at his baggage, he may not be worth the trouble, and, from a business standpoint it means nothing:I find it hard to believe that any Sox fan would even think of boycotting watching or attending the games, even if a cheater like Bonds was in them, and the Sox have no ability to boost attendance, so they couldn’t possibly improve cashflow by signing Bonds.
    Personally, I would boo him…

    Reply

Leave a Reply