<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessing Boston&#8217;s shortstop options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html</link>
	<description>Analyzing the Boston Red Sox since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:55:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M.A.G.</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49661</link>
		<dc:creator>M.A.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49661</guid>
		<description>First of all: Holliday or bust.

Uggla is a terrible defender in 2nd, and his bat don&#039;t look to good in other positions. Phillips is the best option, because he is a GG defender, and has power, which are two things the Sox need. And I think the Reds want to trade him. So, it&#039;s not unrealistic to trade him for a reasonable package. Probably the only problem with him is his health. He has had some imjury problems, but I don&#039;t know how serious this is.

Imagine our lineup with Holliday+Phillips, and a full year of V-Mart. That&#039;s a significant upgrade, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all: Holliday or bust.</p>
<p>Uggla is a terrible defender in 2nd, and his bat don&#8217;t look to good in other positions. Phillips is the best option, because he is a GG defender, and has power, which are two things the Sox need. And I think the Reds want to trade him. So, it&#8217;s not unrealistic to trade him for a reasonable package. Probably the only problem with him is his health. He has had some imjury problems, but I don&#8217;t know how serious this is.</p>
<p>Imagine our lineup with Holliday+Phillips, and a full year of V-Mart. That&#8217;s a significant upgrade, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49672</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49672</guid>
		<description>They only way I see the Sox moving Pedroia is if they get Phillips.  But then is that works out, how temporary would that be?  I don&#039;t know anything about Phillips&#039; contract status. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They only way I see the Sox moving Pedroia is if they get Phillips.  But then is that works out, how temporary would that be?  I don&#039;t know anything about Phillips&#039; contract status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49664</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49664</guid>
		<description>Uggla would be nice but he&#039;s an awful fielder. The Sox would be downgrading defensively by moving Pedroia to SS since he&#039;s such a good 2B, they&#039;ll probably want to acquire a 2B who fields well, like Phillips or Hudson and then move Pedey back to second when Iglesias is ready </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uggla would be nice but he&#039;s an awful fielder. The Sox would be downgrading defensively by moving Pedroia to SS since he&#039;s such a good 2B, they&#039;ll probably want to acquire a 2B who fields well, like Phillips or Hudson and then move Pedey back to second when Iglesias is ready</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49629</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49629</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving this.  Pedey came up as a SS, was All American at SS, won all kinds of national collegiate awards as SS, played SS in the minor leagues and move over for Hanley, and then played a month of games at Fenway att SS.   Today, he talked about his and Ethier&#039;s training program this summer, including flexibility and arm workouts.  Unless the Sox land Hanley (not), I think we will have a GG SS in Pedey.  Could Phillips really be available?   
 
How about Dan Uggla.  I&#039;m becoming ever less certain that Theo will pay extreme $$ for Bay or Holliday, and Jed Hoyer tonite talked about building the Padres around Gonzalez.  Not sure we want MCab.  So, instead of them or Hanley, Theo has a chance to acquire a dominant hitter at 2b.  Uggla is available and I&#039;m willing to bet he will out hit J.Bay in a Sox uni; could turn his 30 to 40HR, then slide into the DH role down the road.  He would be far more reasonable than MCab, Holliday, Bay, &amp; cost no prospects.  Hermida in LF = improved D and 25HR, backed by Reddick &amp; Rocco.  Youk stays at 1b, healthy Mike/Lowrie at 3b for another 50 - 60HR.  This team would have pop, better D than 2009, very high OBP, collect the prospects on J.Bay, save a fortune on MCab/Holliday, and keep core prospects &amp; players (Buch, Kelly, Reddick, etc.).  IMO, this idea is brilliant. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m loving this.  Pedey came up as a SS, was All American at SS, won all kinds of national collegiate awards as SS, played SS in the minor leagues and move over for Hanley, and then played a month of games at Fenway att SS.   Today, he talked about his and Ethier&#039;s training program this summer, including flexibility and arm workouts.  Unless the Sox land Hanley (not), I think we will have a GG SS in Pedey.  Could Phillips really be available?   </p>
<p>How about Dan Uggla.  I&#039;m becoming ever less certain that Theo will pay extreme $$ for Bay or Holliday, and Jed Hoyer tonite talked about building the Padres around Gonzalez.  Not sure we want MCab.  So, instead of them or Hanley, Theo has a chance to acquire a dominant hitter at 2b.  Uggla is available and I&#039;m willing to bet he will out hit J.Bay in a Sox uni; could turn his 30 to 40HR, then slide into the DH role down the road.  He would be far more reasonable than MCab, Holliday, Bay, &amp; cost no prospects.  Hermida in LF = improved D and 25HR, backed by Reddick &amp; Rocco.  Youk stays at 1b, healthy Mike/Lowrie at 3b for another 50 &#8211; 60HR.  This team would have pop, better D than 2009, very high OBP, collect the prospects on J.Bay, save a fortune on MCab/Holliday, and keep core prospects &amp; players (Buch, Kelly, Reddick, etc.).  IMO, this idea is brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcos</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49618</link>
		<dc:creator>marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49618</guid>
		<description>Yea he talked about Phillips, Polanco, Hudson as 2b option </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea he talked about Phillips, Polanco, Hudson as 2b option</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49609</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49609</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of Phillips&#039; swing in Fenway, even if he does strike out a ton.  How much would it require to acquire him though? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of Phillips&#039; swing in Fenway, even if he does strike out a ton.  How much would it require to acquire him though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49602</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49602</guid>
		<description>Yeah but he does have the experience there and he is arguably the best fielding 2b in the league. The big issue isn&#039;t him getting to grounders, he has range to spare, its if he has the arm to play short. He&#039;s got a cannon for a 2B might be average for a SS. I personally think he can do it and then we can look at Phillips/Hudson as short-term 2B options </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but he does have the experience there and he is arguably the best fielding 2b in the league. The big issue isn&#039;t him getting to grounders, he has range to spare, its if he has the arm to play short. He&#039;s got a cannon for a 2B might be average for a SS. I personally think he can do it and then we can look at Phillips/Hudson as short-term 2B options</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49591</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49591</guid>
		<description>Brilliant.  We have the best 2B in the league.  Let&#039;s put him somewhere else! 
 
I suppose it could make the Sox look like geniuses.  Or it could make us look stupid.  Dustin&#039;s offense at SS would be a plus, but the defense is the question.  I seem to recall a Bill James rule of thumb that position shifts toward the more difficult end of the defensive scale rarely work well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.  We have the best 2B in the league.  Let&#039;s put him somewhere else! </p>
<p>I suppose it could make the Sox look like geniuses.  Or it could make us look stupid.  Dustin&#039;s offense at SS would be a plus, but the defense is the question.  I seem to recall a Bill James rule of thumb that position shifts toward the more difficult end of the defensive scale rarely work well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49590</guid>
		<description>A three-year deal for any of the FA options looks risky ... because none of them is that good.  Barring a miracle, at this point I&#039;d rather have the guy we can sign to a short-term deal (and wait for something better to come up or down the line). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A three-year deal for any of the FA options looks risky &#8230; because none of them is that good.  Barring a miracle, at this point I&#039;d rather have the guy we can sign to a short-term deal (and wait for something better to come up or down the line).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.A.G.</title>
		<link>http://firebrandal.com/2009/11/30/assessing-bostons-shortstop-options.html/comment-page-1#comment-49589</link>
		<dc:creator>M.A.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firebrandal.com/?p=6805#comment-49589</guid>
		<description>Wow! This is big news! 
 
I didn&#039;t know moving Pedroia was even a posibility. And, apparently Dusty wants to do it, so, this changes the whole picture. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This is big news! </p>
<p>I didn&#039;t know moving Pedroia was even a posibility. And, apparently Dusty wants to do it, so, this changes the whole picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
