Reader Bill in FLA asked about a few pitcher profiles we could run in Pitch FX, and the first player I thought would be an excellent example of Pitch FX’s capabilities and limitations is Hideki Okajima.
Part of the limitations of Pitch FX, is that until the technology has a way to verify the exact pitch the pitcher intended to throw, the classification is an approximation of the overall speed, movement, and release points the pitches have. This is also why some pitchers have their pitches classified incorrectly, or in Oki’s case, a severe change in classification that was most likely caused by a change in one of those above factors.
My goal with Okajima is to see how Pitch FX would classify the “Okie Dokie”. The team refers to it as part changeup/split/screwball. We know he definitely does not throw it as often as his fastballs and curveballs, but we should be able to pull up his entire pitching maps and find a way to locate the collection of the Okie Dokies.
First, let’s look at the 2007-2009 composite of Okajima’s work.

Okajima 2007-2009
Now, this graph will have a lot of noise (the pitches labeled “CU” near the pitches labeled “2S” are outliers and improperly executed), but you should be able to make out the heavily populated areas of the 5 pitch types to help you decipher what a pitch “should” do. The categorized pitches are:
CU: Curveball
CH: Changeups
FB: Fastballs
FS: Splitters
2S: Two seam Fastballs
Let’s try and find a group of pitches in these categories that are very unlike the standard layout I talked about last week.
Okajima’s curveballs, while not your typical 11-5 or 10-4 curveball path you’ll see Jon Lester throw, look more like a classic 12-6 curveball Kerry Wood and Cole Hamels also throw. He throws this pitch fairly slow to, normally in the mid 70s, in comparison to his high 80s fastballs.
His 4 seam fastballs and changeups are normal. While Okajima doesn’t throw many changeups(hence they being harder to see), they are very tightly clustered, and their frequency has increased each year he’s been with the team.
That leaves the pitches categorized as FS (Splitters) and 2S (two seam fastballs). According to Fan Graphs, the 2S fastball (they list as FT) is a brand new pitch this year, having never been thrown before. Unless Okajima begins to throw his shuuto again (which would look like a cut fastball, but slower), I highly doubt he’s secretly added a new pitch. We also can see Oki’s splitters are offset to the right of his 4 seam fastballs, closer to the overall action of the Okie Dokie as we described above.
If we consider combining those two main pitch groups into one classification, that’s our Okie Dokie. It has the combination of a changeup, a split, and a screwball, and it coincides with everything we’ve seen the pitch do: slightly run into left handers, drop like a split finger, and normally roll in slightly above his changeup speed.
One thing I did find, is that his Okie Dokies this year seemed to average about 2-3 mph slower than previous years, which was consistent with the slight decrease in overall velocity Oki suffered through this year. I’m also curious whether this drop in velocity is possibly related to the fact that the motion to make the Okie Dokie act like a screwball is not quite the most healthy motion for an elbow.
To be honest, I was surprised he throws so few changeups; my perception was always the opposite. But on inspection, it makes sense. He’s mostly a fastball/curveball pitcher, and sprinkles in a few changeups, and a modest amount of Okie Dokies– and we normally see this when he’s pushing for a strike 3.
So Bill in FLA, while this wasn’t focused on Okajima’s changeups (or lack thereof), hopefully this edition of analyzing a Pitch FX profile that didn’t have perfect pitch classification gave you a little more insight into what Okajima does out on the mound.

Pedro could get screwball action out of a circle change …
Yep, Pedro's change was very similar where it slightly ran back into right handers.
If only we had the PFX system from 1999-2002, we could have seen some amazing things from Pedro and the other great pitchers in that era.
Wouldn't this information be around, just not publicly available?
To my knowledge (which may or may not be accurate), the PFX system has only really been in use since 2005-2006, and even then, not all ballparks had it. I do not believe any ballparks were equipped with technology capable of capturing this data back then. Even QuesTec wasn't installed in all ballparks when it became standard in 2002, and only 10 or 11 parks have it now.
Lee, thanks for picking Okajima as an example of how F/X can be used to study a pitchers profile. The Okie- Dokie is still a mystery to batters three years running. The release point and arm speed is so much like his fastball, yet the movement and speed is like you discribed, part changeup/splitter/screwball. His ability to throw it for a strike in high leverage situations is what still amazes me. He can't crack 90 with his fastball, yet he still manages to strike out almost one batter every inning. And when he really needs a strike out, to get out of an inning, he sets 'em up with the curve, and strikes 'em out with the change/Okie-Dokie. It's all deception with Okajima and pin point control. He's like a one inning Greg Maddux.
If you get a chance, check out the Sept 23, 2009 Pitch F/X for Okajima and tell me if you think he was getting squeezed by Barrett in KC. He threw 19 pitches in the inning and 18 could have been called strikes. He had 7 called for balls. Four of those could go either way, but three were in the meat of the dish and I made note of it when Okie was walking around the mound wondering what the strike zone was that day.
I really love having F/X as a tool for fans and it's only going to get better this year with the system improving.
Evan's a hell of head hunter, bringing you and Troy on board. Thanks for work. You're always a good read.
Bill,
I'll try and whip up a quick strikezone plot tonight and update the article.
Thanks Lee. I used BrooksBaseball.net and tried the "ball and strike" setting first, not the "extra detailed setting". Two of the questionable pitches were first and second pitch fastballs against Brayan Pena and they got more than a lot of the plate. Also, 15 pitches were labeled as FF(fourseam fastballs) and 4 were labeled as CU(curveballs). Watching that day, I know that four of the fastballs were the changeup/splitter/screwball. Using the "Horizontal movement x Speed" chart, the separation is clear.
I believe it may have been the speed of his arm that labeled them fastballs.