Fire Brand of the American League
  • RSS :
  • Posts
  • Comments
  • Email
  • Home
  • Team of the Decade
  • Authors
  • Depth Chart
  • Interviews
  • Store

Can Pitch FX track the Okie Dokie?

December 20th, 2009 by Lee Perrault
  • 70668 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2009/12/20/can-pitch-fx-track-the-okie-dokie.htmlCan+Pitch+FX+track+the+Okie+Dokie%3F2009-12-20+13%3A00%3A08Lee+Perrault
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Previous
  • Next

ALDS Los Angeles Angels vs Boston Red Sox

Reader Bill in FLA asked about a few pitcher profiles we could run in Pitch FX, and the first player I thought would be an excellent example of Pitch FX’s capabilities and limitations is Hideki Okajima.

Part of the limitations of Pitch FX, is that until the technology has a way to verify the exact pitch the pitcher intended to throw, the classification is an approximation of the overall speed, movement, and release points the pitches have.  This is also why some pitchers have their pitches classified incorrectly, or in Oki’s case, a severe change in classification that was most likely caused by a change in one of those above factors.

My goal with Okajima is to see how Pitch FX would classify the “Okie Dokie”.  The team refers to it as part changeup/split/screwball.  We know he definitely does not throw it as often as his fastballs and curveballs, but we should be able to pull up his entire pitching maps and find a way to locate the collection of the Okie Dokies.

First, let’s look at the 2007-2009 composite of Okajima’s work.

Okajima 2007-2009

Okajima 2007-2009

Now, this graph will have a lot of noise (the pitches labeled “CU” near the pitches labeled “2S” are outliers and improperly executed), but you should be able to make out the heavily populated areas of the 5 pitch types to help you decipher what a pitch “should” do.  The categorized pitches are:

CU: Curveball

CH: Changeups

FB: Fastballs

FS: Splitters

2S: Two seam Fastballs

Let’s try and find a group of pitches in these categories that are very unlike the standard layout I talked about last week.

Okajima’s curveballs, while not your typical 11-5 or 10-4 curveball path you’ll see Jon Lester throw, look more like a classic 12-6 curveball Kerry Wood and Cole Hamels also throw.  He throws this pitch fairly slow to, normally in the mid 70s, in comparison to his high 80s fastballs.

His 4 seam fastballs and changeups are normal.  While Okajima doesn’t throw many changeups(hence they being harder to see), they are very tightly clustered, and their frequency has increased each year he’s been with the team.

That leaves the pitches categorized as FS (Splitters) and 2S (two seam fastballs).  According to Fan Graphs, the 2S fastball (they list as FT) is a brand new pitch this year, having never been thrown before.  Unless Okajima begins to throw his shuuto again (which would look like a cut fastball, but slower), I highly doubt he’s secretly added a new pitch.  We also can see Oki’s splitters are offset to the right of his 4 seam fastballs, closer to the overall action of the Okie Dokie as we described above.

If we consider combining those two main pitch groups into one classification, that’s our Okie Dokie.  It has the combination of a changeup, a split, and a screwball, and it coincides with everything we’ve seen the pitch do: slightly run into left handers, drop like a split finger, and normally roll in slightly above his changeup speed.

One thing I did find, is that his Okie Dokies this year seemed to average about 2-3 mph slower than previous years, which was consistent with the slight decrease in overall velocity Oki suffered through this year.  I’m also curious whether this drop in velocity is possibly related to the fact that the motion to make the Okie Dokie act like a screwball is not quite the most healthy motion for an elbow.

To be honest, I was surprised he throws so few changeups; my perception was always the opposite.  But on inspection, it makes sense.  He’s mostly a fastball/curveball pitcher, and sprinkles in a few changeups, and a modest amount of Okie Dokies– and we normally see this when he’s pushing for a strike 3.

So Bill in FLA, while this wasn’t focused on Okajima’s changeups (or lack thereof), hopefully this edition of analyzing a Pitch FX profile that didn’t have perfect pitch classification gave you a little more insight into what Okajima does out on the mound.

  • Share/Bookmark
Filed under Hideki Okajima
« « Pizza Cutter: Deconstructing Marco Scutaro
Mike Lowell fails physical in Texas » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

70668 Commentshttp://firebrandal.com/2009/12/20/can-pitch-fx-track-the-okie-dokie.htmlCan+Pitch+FX+track+the+Okie+Dokie%3F2009-12-20+13%3A00%3A08Lee+Perrault to “Can Pitch FX track the Okie Dokie?”

  • Sam says:
    December 20, 2009 at 3:37 PM

    Pedro could get screwball action out of a circle change …

    Reply
    • Lee Perrault says:
      December 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM

      Yep, Pedro's change was very similar where it slightly ran back into right handers.

      If only we had the PFX system from 1999-2002, we could have seen some amazing things from Pedro and the other great pitchers in that era.

      Reply
      • evanbrunell says:
        December 20, 2009 at 5:55 PM

        Wouldn't this information be around, just not publicly available?

        Reply
        • Lee Perrault says:
          December 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM

          To my knowledge (which may or may not be accurate), the PFX system has only really been in use since 2005-2006, and even then, not all ballparks had it. I do not believe any ballparks were equipped with technology capable of capturing this data back then. Even QuesTec wasn't installed in all ballparks when it became standard in 2002, and only 10 or 11 parks have it now.

          Reply
  • Bill in FLA says:
    December 21, 2009 at 8:50 AM

    Lee, thanks for picking Okajima as an example of how F/X can be used to study a pitchers profile. The Okie- Dokie is still a mystery to batters three years running. The release point and arm speed is so much like his fastball, yet the movement and speed is like you discribed, part changeup/splitter/screwball. His ability to throw it for a strike in high leverage situations is what still amazes me. He can't crack 90 with his fastball, yet he still manages to strike out almost one batter every inning. And when he really needs a strike out, to get out of an inning, he sets 'em up with the curve, and strikes 'em out with the change/Okie-Dokie. It's all deception with Okajima and pin point control. He's like a one inning Greg Maddux.

    Reply
  • Bill in FLA says:
    December 21, 2009 at 8:51 AM

    If you get a chance, check out the Sept 23, 2009 Pitch F/X for Okajima and tell me if you think he was getting squeezed by Barrett in KC. He threw 19 pitches in the inning and 18 could have been called strikes. He had 7 called for balls. Four of those could go either way, but three were in the meat of the dish and I made note of it when Okie was walking around the mound wondering what the strike zone was that day.
    I really love having F/X as a tool for fans and it's only going to get better this year with the system improving.
    Evan's a hell of head hunter, bringing you and Troy on board. Thanks for work. You're always a good read.

    Reply
    • Lee Perrault says:
      December 21, 2009 at 3:12 PM

      Bill,

      I'll try and whip up a quick strikezone plot tonight and update the article.

      Reply
      • Bill in FLA says:
        December 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM

        Thanks Lee. I used BrooksBaseball.net and tried the "ball and strike" setting first, not the "extra detailed setting". Two of the questionable pitches were first and second pitch fastballs against Brayan Pena and they got more than a lot of the plate. Also, 15 pitches were labeled as FF(fourseam fastballs) and 4 were labeled as CU(curveballs). Watching that day, I know that four of the fastballs were the changeup/splitter/screwball. Using the "Horizontal movement x Speed" chart, the separation is clear.
        I believe it may have been the speed of his arm that labeled them fastballs.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.


Recent Posts

  • This Thank You Is Huge
  • Is Tampa Bay pitching overrated?
  • AL West Sleepers
  • Scheduling Highlights
  • Evan Brunell’s 2010 MLB Predictions: Does Boston win it?

Fire Brand Poll

What place will Boston finish in the division?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

  • Shane on This Thank You Is Huge
  • GreggB on This Thank You Is Huge
  • Brandon Kessler on Evan Brunell’s 2010 MLB Predictions: Does Boston win it?
  • donna on This Thank You Is Huge
  • Shane on This Thank You Is Huge

Red Sox blogosphere

Fireside Chats Podcast

Search Fire Brand

Categories

Fire Brand Award


  • J.D. Drew
    2010 Fire Brand

Links

  • Find cheap MLB tickets including Boston Red Sox tickets NY Yankees tickets 2010 All-Star Game tickets and the Philadelphia Phillies schedule.
  • Find great deals on Boston Red Sox tickets from sports ticket broker Coast to Coast!
  • MLB Betting and Sports Betting Lines at the Internet’s Premier Sportsbook
  • Blogroll
  • Trivia
  • Twitter: Evan
  • Twitter: Fire Brand
  • Twitter: Tim
  • Advertorial: All Hail The Kings

Quotes

  • "It's amazing how many club officials read...Fire Brand of the American League." - Peter Gammons
  • "Run by Evan Brunell...this has perspective and weight to it that goes against the stereotype of the screaming Red Sox fan." - Deadspin
  • "For in-depth coverage and analysis of everything that happens with the Boston Red Sox, you can’t beat Fire Brand of the American League!" - David Pinto

Calendar

December 2009
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Archives

Fire Brand of the American League is proudly powered by WordPress. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) | Swift by Satish Gandham a product of SwiftThemes.Com