'Jacoby  Ellsbury' photo (c) 2011, Keith Allison - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/Surplus.  Every team wants it, but very few teams have it.  If you were to look solely at the Red Sox 25-man roster, you’d see a roster bereft of surplus at a number of spots.  While their starting pitching, infield, and catching situations are incredibly solid; the outfield is currently staffed with three replacement level players and a platoon player, and the relief core (though pitching very well) is filled with fringy (but capable) arms.  This is hardly what you’d expect from  a club with a $180M payroll.

That being said, looking only at the 25-man roster can be misleading.  This is especially true in the case of the 2012 Red Sox, as those in the minor leagues and on the 15-day and 60-day DL aren’t included as “active members.”  Once we expand out the roster to include everyone, we begin to see the incredible depth the Red Sox have put together at both of their “deficient” spots.  While this seems great (and it is), it doesn’t come without a few unintended consequences.

Before we go into that, let’s take a look at the roster as it’s currently constructed.

PitchersAlfredo Aceves, Matt Albers, Scott Atchison, Josh Beckett, Clay Buchholz, Felix Doubront, Jon Lester, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Mark Melancon, Andrew Miller, Franklin Morales, Vicente Padilla

CatchersJarrod Saltalamacchia, Kelly Shoppach

InfieldersMike Aviles, Adrian Gonzalez, Will Middlebrooks, Dustin Pedroia, Nick Punto, Kevin Youkilis

OutfieldersDarnell McDonald, Daniel Nava, Scott Podsednik, Ryan Sweeney

Designated HitterDavid Ortiz

Minor LeaguesLars Anderson, Daniel Bard, Drake Britton, Mauro Gomez, Jose Iglesias, Ryan Kalish, Ryan Lavarnway, Che-Hsuan Lin, Clayton Mortensen, Stolmy Pimentel, Junichi Tazawa, Oscar Tejada

15-Day DLAaron Cook, Rich Hill, Cody Ross

60-Day DLAndrew Bailey, Chris Carpenter, Carl Crawford, Jacoby Ellsbury, Bobby Jenks, John Lackey, Jason Repko

In discussing the potential unintended consequences, let’s start out with the 60-day disabled list.  Once a team has filled up all 40 spots on their 40-man roster, teams are given the capability to place injured players on the 60-day disabled list.  While this might not seem like a big deal, players on the 60-day DL are not included on the team’s 40-man roster.  This allows teams greater levels of flexibility when dealing with players suffering from long-term injuries.

Currently, the Red Sox have seven such players:  Bailey, Carpenter, Crawford, Ellsbury, Jenks, Lackey, and Repko.  (Matsuzaka and Kalish were recently taken off of the 60-day DL and placed on the active roster.)  It’s pretty clear that Lackey and Jenks won’t be removed from the DL this year due to the severity of their injuries.  Repko, given there are ten better outfielders currently on the roster, will likely be designated for assignment, rather than be added to the active 40-man roster once he’s healthy enough to return to action.  That leaves Bailey, Carpenter, Crawford, and Ellsbury as likely to activated before the end of the season; thereby necessitating the availability of four roster spots.

How can the Red Sox alleviate their eventual 40-man roster crunch? 

  1. Trade players from the 40-man roster, and acquire non-40 man roster prospects in return
  2. Designate players (i.e. dead weight) for assignment
  3. Transfer players from the 15-day DL to the 60-day DL

Barring another long-term injury, option three seems pretty remote.  This leaves options one and two as the most likely to be used. 

Trading players, even when there’s a need, is notoriously difficult.  Two teams (or sometimes three or four) need to agree to terms on all aspects of a proposed deal.  Many issues can arise that can derail a completely deal at the last possible second.  Last year’s Rich Harden for Lars Anderson deal is a great example. 

As it stands for the moment, the Red Sox have little in the way of trade commodities.  Most of the players teams would typically be interested in acquiring are either off limits (in terms of expected return) or not cost-feasible (in terms of contract situation).  Kevin Youkilis is, quite frankly, the only person of note with whom teams are actively interested, but even has obvious flaws.  His market his boosted by his favorable contract situation and position flexbility.  Even still, trading Youk only helps the Red Sox’s roster crunch if he’s traded for prospects in the low-minors.  If he’s traded for legit major league quality players, his trade is a wash in terms of the roster situation.  Outside of Youk (and possibly Lavarnway), mostly only undesirables and “throw ins” remain as possible trade options.   These guys can supplement a trade, but can’t carry it. 

This brings us to designating players for assignment.  I’ve already mentioned Repko as a possible candidate, but he’s not currently on the 40-man roster.  As such he’s not up for consideration.  Who else might be candidates? 

Let’s start with the outfield.  With Daniel Nava (.401 wOBA) providing solid value and steady performance in left field, it’s probably fair to say that he’s earned his spot for the remainder of the season.  This leaves Scott Podsednik, Darnell McDonald, and Lars Anderson as potential candidates.  Anderson carries little value at this point as he’s established himself as a quad-A player.  His power never developed, and he’s ill-equipped defensively at both first base and left field.  Podsednik has performed admirably, but players like him are a dime a dozen.  The same is true with McDonald, but his ability to hit lefties will probably allow him to avoid being DFA’d for now. 

In the infield, I see two players that could fit this bill in Punto and Gomez.  Punto seems unlikely given he’s on the books for both this season and next.  Given his defensive ability and versatility, he provides enough value to justify keeping him on the roster.  Gomez, on the other hand, is fringy at best.  He’s the kind of player that every team has in their system on a “just in case” basis.  The problem with him is that he’s surplus.  The Red Sox could call up Iglesias or add Pedro Ciracio (a better option) to the 40-man roster in an emergency. 

In terms of pitching, any number of moves could be made.  For example, Atchison and Albers aren’t exactly known for their ability to perform consistently at the major league level.  A prolonged slump by either could spell the death of them with the Red Sox.  Vicente Padilla also seems like he could be a marked man.  Once Bailey returns to the fold, he’ll likely re-assume his duties of closer; thus allowing Aceves to move back into the “fireman” role he encumbered last season.  With Padilla currently filling that role; he could end up being the odd man out.  Lastly, I’d be remiss to not identify two struggling prospects, Drake Britton and Stolmy Pimentel, as possible candidates.  Both are currently in pitching in AA with little hope of helping the major league club prior to 2014–if at all.  Eventually, management will need to decide whether it’s worth tying up two valuable roster spots to fading talent. 

So what would you do?  Would you try to trade Youkilis for major league talent or non-40 man roster prospects?  Would you consider trading away any other players, like Sweeney or Lavarnway?  If you failed to free up any of the roster spaces, which players would you designate for assignment?  Let us know in the comments section!

Categories: Aaron Cook Adrian Gonzalez Alfredo Aceves Andrew Bailey Andrew Miller Bobby Jenks Boston Red Sox Carl Crawford Che-Hsuan Lin Clay Buchholz Clayton Mortensen Cody Ross Daisuke Matsuzaka Daniel Bard Daniel Nava Darnell McDonald David Ortiz Drake Britton Dustin Pedroia Felix Doubront Franklin Morales Jacoby Ellsbury Jarrod Saltalamacchia Jason Repko John Lackey Jon Lester Jose Iglesias Josh Beckett Junichi Tazawa Kelly Shoppach Kevin Youkilis Lars Anderson Mark Melancon Matt Albers Mauro Gomez Mike Aviles Nick Punto Oscar Tejeda Rich Hill Ryan Kalish Ryan Lavarnway Ryan Sweeney Scott Atchison Stolmy Pimentel Vicente Padilla Will Middlebrooks

After being slapped with a restraining order for stealing Nick Cafardo's mail, I was forced into retirement for a brief period of time. As fun as it was to lounge around the community pool and play shuffleboard with noted internet columnist, Murray Chass, I quickly felt a yearning to write again. Now in my second tenure with Fire Brand, I have set lofty goals of achieving world domination, ending the plight of the hipsters, and becoming BFFs with Mike Trout. I am fluent in two languages (Sarcasm and English, in that order); have an intimate relationship with M&Ms; firmly believe that Lucille is the best character on Arrested Development; and spend my spare time trolling select members of the Boston media. You can follow me on Twitter @Chip_Buck.

7 Responses to “The Impending Roster Crunch” Subscribe

  1. @Chad_Phelps June 13, 2012 at 9:26 AM #

    I would DFA McDonald and Podsednik. An outfield consisting of Crawford, Ellsbury, Ross, Sweeney, and Nava is pretty good in my book. McDonald's ability to hit LHP doesn't justify keeping him on the roster at this point. He's a streaky player at best, and at times he's just a flat out offensive black-hole.

    As far as pitching, I'd be hesitant to pull the plug on any of the guys that we have, but if I had to, maybe Albers? Certainly not Padilla. His numbers in regards to stranding men on base are staggering.

    In the infield, I'm convinced that Punto (as great of a guy as he seems to be) is expendable. Clearly, he's struggling with the inability to get into rhythm in limited playing time. I'm sure another team could use him more regularly. I'd also be on board with DFAing Gomez and Anderson. The former is no more than a career minor leaguer, and the latter never developed.

    Finally, in regards to Youk, I'd be happy to trade him for lower level prospects so long as the team buying would be willing to pick up much of his salary.

  2. Jason June 13, 2012 at 10:42 AM #

    I would trade Youk and Sweeney – Again, like you said, trades are difficult, but I would trade Sweeney asap while his value is stable. What can he do that a healthy Kalish cannot? DFA Podsednik and Gomez.
    With all that said…I have a feeling something big is going to go down, just not sure what

  3. DezoPenguin June 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM #

    I'd also DFA (or attempt to trade for prospects) McDonald and Podsednik. Nava's earned his spot as the fifth OF, and once everyone comes back healthy, there's no point in keeping an extra right-handed bad on the bench–and for all his "ability to hit left-handed pitching," this year McDonald's splits against lefties and righties are basically photocopies of one another. Plus, he's 33.

    (Mind you, if someone looks as Nava this year and thinks "this career AAAA guy has established a new level of performance," I'd certainly trade him and keep McDonald or Pod, since the starters–once uninjured–have him blocked anyway even if that assessment is true.)

    Punto needs to go. He's a utility infielder who provides very little actual utility. Aviles is better-suited to do that job, with a ML-quality upgrade at SS a good move (unfortunately, with the condition of SS in the big leagues today, as I observed this past weekend about Ian Desmond of the Nationals, there's not many guys out there who are a real improvement on Aviles in terms of a complete game).

    Padilla's been good this year, but there's nothing in his career to suggest that it's much more than luck at work, and when Bailey returns Aceves is going to take Padilla's job. Presuming that Morales and Melancon also stay around, that leaves just three slots left in the 'pen. I would keep Albers and Atchison over Miller (unless another starter meltdown pushes Miller into that role again).

    Mostly, though, in terms of potential trades, I'd consider using some of the OF and bullpen extras–particularly guys who are overperforming–as throw-in bits for a trade of Youk to a contender (wouldn't Pittsburgh, for example, be more than happy to try out Nava in LF/RF on an extended basis given the sucking chest wound that is their offense?) in exchange for either prospects or SP/SS help.

  4. Walt in Maryland June 13, 2012 at 2:50 PM #

    The most important questioin to answer first is, "How aggressively are the Sox going to be in trying to get a playoff spot this year?"

    I don't expect them to go all in, any more than I expect them to blow up the roster and build for the future. Most likely, we'll be looking at some sort of hybrid approach that does a little of both.

  5. Walt in Maryland June 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM #

    In no particular order, here are the players the Sox have to trade that could be most attractive to contenders:


    I deliberately didn't include any "big names" like Beckett, or any journeymen like Padilla, Podsednik, McDonald or Atchison.

    But I could see a scenario where the Sox deal Youkilis, Aviles and Sweeney and replace them with Middlebrooks, Iglesias and Kalish. And they have several bullpen candiates at Pawtucket who could replace someone like Albers.

    If the Sox are willing to trade Miller, I'll bet they could get a very good return. I'd hate to lose him, but this could be one of this situations where he's more valuable to the organization as trade bait.

    • Lyndsay June 15, 2012 at 11:34 PM #

      Aviles? really? Guy has been a huge asset since the beginning of the season and a good offensive spark plug in the absence of Jacoby Ellsbury, plus he's (I've heard) a great clubhouse guy. I know it's an intangible but I think he's too important to the personality of this team. I have always loved Punto's defense but he's an offensive liability.

      Every day I look at the roster and go, how exactly is Darnell McDonald still on this team?? Keep Ross, Sweeney and Nava. Bailey and Melancon are still too unproven to me to get rid of Padilla and Atchison. I have way more faith in them on the mound than on Albers, Morales or Miller, who have historically been way too inconsistent. Albers could be DL'ing again by September. Plus I hope Bard doesn't get stuck down in AAA the rest of the season and there is a spot for him again at some point.

    • Angel Torres June 20, 2012 at 8:47 PM #

      This is silly to trade Aviles who has been one of the best ss off and def. this year. You need to go to Baseball 101!