The Red Sox’ Next Ace Is Not Coming From The Farm

Facing some hard truths about Boston's talented trio of pitching prospects.

With Jon Lester’s best days clearly behind him and Clay Buchholz’ inability to stay on the mound a serious problem, it’s fair to say the Red Sox do not have a real No. 1 starter.

Given Boston’s highly touted farm system, the inclination is to look down on the farm for the next Red Sox ace. And by most accounts, the Red Sox have three of the top 50 or 60 starting pitching prospects in the game in Matt Barnes, Allen Webster and Anthony Ranaudo.

Matt Barnes is currently the only Red Sox prospect who truly projects as a No. 2 starter. Photo by Kelly O'Connor.

Matt Barnes is currently the only Red Sox prospect who truly projects as a No. 2 starter. Photo by Kelly O’Connor.

But if Sox fans are banking on one of those players becoming Boston’s next ace, they’re likely to be disappointed. That’s the reality we face with the majority of the 2013 season in the books, and with the majority of the players listed above fighting through challenging seasons.

You know the backgrounds of these players by now. Barnes was the team’s first selection in 2011, and was generally considered the team’s second or third-best minor leaguer headed into the year.

He has a 5.22 ERA in 70.2 Double-A innings, posting a great K/9 of 11.21 but a poor BB/9 of 3.57. Advanced statistics suggest he’s been the victim of some bad luck (3.68 FIP), but many scouting reports suggest he’s becoming susceptible to the “big inning.” He’s currently day-to-day with a wrist injury sustained on a comebacker in early July, but has the highest upside of any Red Sox MiLB pitcher.

Webster was one of the pieces that came back in the megastealdeal the Sox made with the Dodgers last season, and the one most poised to make an impact for the Red Sox in 2013.
In 58 Triple-A innings, he’s been pretty good, posting a 3.41 ERA, 10.24 K/9 and 3.57 BB/9. The 4.13 FIP suggests he’s been a bit unlucky, but that’s not a stat that means a lot in such a small sample at the MiLB level.

In 26.1 MLB innings this year, Webster’s been a train wreck. He has a 9.57 ERA, has walked 14 batters and has already given up 7 homeruns. He’s demonstrated an inability to keep his fastball down in the zone, and an inability to adjust when hitters are sitting dead red. Webster has since been temporarily passed on the Sox’ depth chart by Brandon Workman.

Finally, we have Ranaudo: a man many prospect enthusiasts – myself included – left for dead at the beginning of the season, but whose revived his career in Double-A. The 23-year-old LSU product has a 2.67 ERA in 91.0 innings in Portland, striking out more than a batter per inning with a tolerable BB/9 rate of 3.10. He’s in line for a promotion soon.

As I wrote in my piece last week, though, Ranaudo didn’t blow me away when I saw him in person. I am not a qualified scout and I only saw one start, but none of Ranaudo’s pitches stood out as truly exceptional – although the curve was very good – and there was no deception in his delivery. I see more of a mid-rotation starter than a potential No. 2: great considering where Ranaudo began the year, but disappointing given the hype he’s received since.

And that point underscores a hard truth about all three of these pitching prospects: they don’t project as elite MLB starters.

Stating that they don’t project as aces is hardly an insult. The only minor leaguers I can confidently project as true No. 1s are Archie Bradley and Taijuan Walker, with Dylan Bundy and Lucas Giolito worthy of mention as well once they recover from their various injuries.
But for me, Barnes, Webster and Ranaudo don’t project as No. 2 starters either. Barnes and Webster are both fighting through command issues – hardly a death sentence for right-handed power pitchers – but neither possesses a third plus pitch. Ranaudo is doing a better job directing the ball, but I’m not sure any pitch other than his curve grades out at 60.

This isn’t to suggest that the Sox’ trio of righties doesn’t have value. Even league-average starters who are under team control for six years are incredibly valuable to any organization, freeing up the team to allocate resources in other places. And while I don’t think they’re potential forces, calling Barnes and Webster league-average could easily be selling them a bit short.

Given the attrition rate we see with pitching prospects, having three all come up within the same 12-to-15 months also gives the Sox some insurance. If Webster does have to move to the bullpen, Barnes and Ranaudo could perhaps still slot in a 3 and 4 in the rotation for the next several years. If Barnes takes longer to develop than originally thought, that’s all the more reason to give Webster longer to sort his issues out.

Workman and Rubby De La Rosa factor in to the picture here as well, although I think the former has a No. 4 ceiling and the later is our closer of the future.

While this might seem discouraging to Red Sox fans, I’d argue that much of what I just wrote is actually a positive. That we can name five pitchers who are all potentially capable of pitching in a big league rotation soon is a terrific sign for an organization that, as recently as a few seasons ago, was bereft of quality MiLB starting options. Now we can fill an entire projected rotation.

The only problem is, baring a big step forward from Barnes, such a rotation wouldn’t include a true top of the rotation force. As Sox fans bristle at the thought of giving up good prospects for a player like Cliff Lee or other aces, that’s probably good to keep in mind.

Categories: Allen Webster Anthony Ranaudo Boston Red Sox Brandon Workman Clay Buchholz Jon Lester Matt Barnes Rubby de la Rosa

Ben is a graduate of Boston University with a degree in journalism and a love of all things Red Sox and minor league baseball. He has experience writing for Baseball Prospectus, NESN, RotoExperts, BU Today and other sites, and typically serves as an in-house MiLB writer. An editor for a business website by day, Ben likes to grill, sample IPAs and re-read Faulkner novels by night. He is an unabashed J.D. Drew apologist with a deep-seated fear of middle relievers. Follow Ben on Twitter here.

7 Responses to “The Red Sox’ Next Ace Is Not Coming From The Farm” Subscribe

  1. Ab3333333 July 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM #

    drake Britton? Not mentioned. He’s better than all the others you mentioned
    Might want to do better research of a team before writing about it

    • JK7_ July 15, 2013 at 7:33 PM #

      @Ab3333333Dear Mrs. Britton, 
      Who on earth has Britton ahead of Webster, Ranaudo, and Barnes? Shoot, we can take it a step farther, most informed people have him behind several other pitchers in the system. has him behind those three, De La Rosa, Ball, Owens, and Workman. Plenty of people don’t even think that he projects to be a starter in the majors, but as a possible late inning arm. 
      You might want to do better research before you try and make someone else look foolish and come off as an unknowledgeable d-bag.

    • louie July 16, 2013 at 3:22 PM #

      @Ab3333333 LOL.

    • BenCarsley22 July 16, 2013 at 9:54 PM #

      @Ab3333333 Any reason why you think Britton is better than the players I listed? Never heard anyone say that and don’t see it myself, so I’d like your POV.

      • Kurt July 19, 2013 at 8:34 PM #

        BenCarsley22 I think @Ab3333333 is actually Drake Britton.  Or Drake Britton’s mother.

  2. SoxFanForsyth July 16, 2013 at 7:53 AM #

    I think an argument could be made that Ball and Owens both have ace potential. Although they’re both about 2-3 seasons out, that may be the next time the Sox have a “true ace”. They can live with Buchholz making 25 starts and having someone from the deep farm step in and take his starts while he’s injured, but when he’s actually throwing, he puts up ace numbers. He’s not an ace because an ace takes the ball every 5 days, and Buchholz is too injury prone. But regardless, I think the next true Red Sox ace may actually come from the farm, he’s just a bit farther out than the names mentioned above.

    • BenCarsley22 July 16, 2013 at 9:53 PM #

      SoxFanForsyth I disagree with Owens and Ball as future aces. I’m the “low man” on Owens here in that I only view him as a No. 3 starter, though. Perhaps if Ball sees a Pat Corbin-like jump in velo he’d qualify, but it’s too early to project .
      You bring up a good point, though. The next ace could certainly come from the farm system and simply not be one of the names I mentioned above. Thanks!