To be honest, the offseason frustrates me more than the regular season does. At least in the regular season, the team can right some wrongs just by winning a game the next day and everyone will be happy and content. Beers all around.

Now, however, no one will be fine unless the Red Sox get every single good player available. And I mean every single one. That includes one Mr. Giancarlo Stanton.

You're so good, but so expensive. Photo credit: paul.hadsall on

You’re so good, but so expensive.
Photo credit: paul.hadsall on

Don’t get me wrong, Giancarlo Stanton’s a great young player. Being only 24 years young, his hit tool is unbelievable, and he makes any other corner outfielder’s production look puny in comparison. This is in no way a rag sheet on Stanton himself. He’s not the problem here. This is more of a public service announcement to get people to please stop pushing for a trade.

First off, this is a paraphrase of the last known news on Stanton’s trade availability: no.

The Marlins aren’t going to trade him this winter, which basically means unless you throw everything – including the kitchen sink – at Miami, they won’t even start talking to you. You think they weren’t open to trades during the season? They definitely aren’t now. Attempting to pry Stanton away from the Marlins is a fool’s gambit, because if it takes that much to just get in the door, imagine how high the price will be to get what you want.

The Stanton Trade Talks Club entry form would be filled out like a circle-what-you-want menu that would be something similar to this:

That doesn’t even include any major leaguers the Red Sox would probably have to send. That’s borderline insane right there. I don’t even think Mike Trout would currently be worth a grab bag of these guys. That’s how much inherent value these prospects have, and I propose the ridiculously crazy idea that maybe the Sox should, like, keep them because they’re good and stuff.

Nevertheless, there are some who continue to insist that the Red Sox have to do it. “They have the right pieces!” they cry. “Boston has to defend the title!” they scream. “The Sox need him!” they clamor. Truth is, any trade you have to make is a bad trade. It’s bad business if you absolutely positively must make a transaction like this. You’re begging to be ripped off, and even if the Marlins aren’t the paragon of smart decisions, Miami general manager Dan Jennings won’t settle for the minimum. That’s why he’s a GM. He’s got cost-controlled, fantastic young player with a lot of growth ahead of him, so Jennings will get as much as he can for him.

Kyle Weiland

Well, at least Weiland’s in Houston now.

For the Red Sox, a trade like this would be akin to a return to the Stone Age. Those seven guys up there either are or will be major-league ready within the next two years. They are valuable solutions to positional gaps and solid depth. Want to know what happens when a team has no internal solutions for injuries or depth? You get the Red Sox in 2011 & 2012, a period in which Tim Wakefield (4.99 FIP in ’11), Kyle Weiland (6.55 FIP in ’11) and Aaron Cook (5.45 FIP in ’12) combined for a mind-numbing fifty-one starts. 51 games out of 324. The Red Sox began 15% of those games in 2011 & 2012 with a high chance of losing simply from the ineptitude of the starters they used because their minor leagues were barren at the time.

The “no matter the cost” crowd terrifies me. They would set fire to the entire farm system, throwing away guys like Mookie Betts for Stanton. I’m glad none of them are in the front office, because they’d turn the Red Sox into the American League version of the Philadelphia Phillies.

The Phillies have almost nothing of note in their farm system, and had to use guys such as Freddy Galvis (0.1 fWAR in ’13), Darin Ruf (0.1 fWAR in ’13), and the indomitable Michael Young (0.0 fWAR in ’13) to play unreasonable amounts of innings for them. That’s what happens when you trade everything for Roy Halladay and Cliff Lee. Sure, they were – and in Lee’s case, still is – good at pitching, but now the Phillies are left with nothing else in the minors.

Those are the pitfalls when it comes to trading for Stanton. Fans, and even some beat writers are so enamored with the fact that the Red Sox can trade for the outfielder. That never means that they should. The stardom that Stanton exudes seems to blind people from the ludicrously steep cost, and hopefully Ben Cherington isn’t just as sightless. All the top prospects Boston has now are worth more combined than just one massive trade for a single player. The Red Sox just climbed out of the mediocrity of 2011 & 2012 with a lot of help from their farm system. There’s no need to go back to where we started.

Categories: 2012 Boston Red Sox 2013 Boston Red Sox 2014 Red Sox offseason Aaron Cook Ben Cherington Blake Swihart Boston Red Sox Cliff Lee Darin Ruf Devin Marrero Freddy Galvis Garin Cecchini Giancarlo Stanton Henry Owens Jackie Bradley Kyle Weiland Matt Barnes Miami Marlins Michael Young Mike Trout Philadelphia Phillies Roy Halladay Tim Wakefield Xander Bogaerts

Brett Cowett is a young, die-hard Red Sox fan. An undergrad at Arizona State University, Brett is studying digital journalism with a minor in Dustin Pedroia studies. Apart from laughing at Nick Swisher's escapades in the field, Brett enjoys the occasional sci-fi flick, playing Halo, and being snarky. Follow him at @BACowett for more baseball, random musings, and random baseball musings.

5 Responses to “Buyer’s Remorse” Subscribe

  1. Gerry November 24, 2013 at 5:37 PM #

    Well said. Love Stanton but my heart, along with my certitude of their value to yeam-building, is with those kids. This IS thw World Champion Red Sox. They need to be better in 2014 because other teams will be better. They also need to fill holes from Ells and Drew, maybe Nap. They have already done so, long term, with XB, JBJ, WMB. Why not see just how close to their ceilings Cecchini, Betts, Hassan, Brentz, The Pitchers, The Catchers, as well as Nava, Carp, Doubront, Tazawa, Workman can reach? The magic and the BAPIP are not chimera as a new magic is about to begin if we keep the kids coming along.

  2. TomonCapCod November 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM #

    @Gerry Part of team (and organization) building is stockpiling prospects not just for development, but for the correct trade.  It is possible that Stanton might be that correct trade.  The biggest void throughout the organization is the lack of a certified middle of the order power guy.  XB has great bat speed, and someday could hit 20-25 HR’s, maybe.  Brentz profiles as a second division low-OBP, medium power guy, who is vulnerable to good RH’d pitching.  Middlebrooks shows no evidence of ever developing into a 3-4 or even a reliable 5 hitter.  Gerry, you listed a range of prospects, a few of whom could have relatively high ceillings, none of whom are ever likely to hit as well as Stanton already has.  If they could get Stanton and still manage to keep Cecchini, Bogaerts and whoever they feels is their best pitching prospect, I’d do it if, and only if, I was willing to commit to a Manny-type contract for him eventually.  BTW, BABIP tends to be a two-edged sword.  An extremely high BABIP is far less helpful in predicting future production than OPS+, RC/27, BJ’s Favorite  Toy our any number of other advanced metrics.

  3. BACowett November 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM #

    TomonCapCod There’s no way the Sox are getting Stanton w/o losing either Bogaerts or Cecchini. Prospects with plate discipline of their caliber are extremely valuable.

  4. TomonCapCod November 26, 2013 at 12:39 AM #

    BACowett TomonCapCod  They are, but arms are more valuable, and we have a number of attractive ones plus Bradley, Middlebrooks, Betts, Swihoff and  as chips.  Ranaudo, Workman, Barnes, Webster, Rubby and Owens all have value.  There is a package there for a salary-conscious team.  I didn’t mention Lin because I like to keep him, just in case Xander outgrows SS, but if it made the deal I’d use him as well.  If they want Middlebrooks,  Brentz  or MarreroI’d include him.  Some group of 3 to 5 players might (the operative word) might get him.

  5. jsc1973 December 2, 2013 at 10:43 PM #

    I’m all in favor of the Red Sox acquiring Giancarlo Stanton. In December of 2016, when he’s a free agent a month past his 27th birthday.
    But not now. Those prospects we’d have to trade to get him are going to be worth more than Stanton alone. Heck, give Bogaerts a few years and he might be a better all-around player than Stanton.